Collagen plays a crucial role in maintaining the structure of different organs and tissues. In contrast, hydrolyzed collagen is a group of peptides with a low molecular weight obtained enzymatically. This review covers different methods applied for collagen extraction, the bioactivities possessed by collagen, and the potential application of hydrolyzed collagen in many sectors. Acid, alkali, and enzyme extractions are the standard methods used for collagen extraction. Still, the enzyme extraction method was the most efficient and preferred due to less waste and shortened processing time. Although advanced collagen extraction techniques, such as deep eutectic solvent extraction, supercritical fluid extraction, and microwave-assisted extraction, offer potential benefits, they currently face hurdles related to optimization, product stability, initial capital investment, and operational complexity. The hydrolyzed collagen provides good functional properties because of its bioactivities, such as antifreeze, antioxidant, antihypertensive, and anticancer properties. The applications of hydrolyzed collagen in the functional food, biomedical, and cosmetics industries are also discussed extensively. As far as the research is concerned, there still needs to be a review of various hydrolyzed collagen sources for their bioactive properties and potential applications. Therefore, the present review examines the production, bioactive properties, and potential application of hydrolyzed collagen from different sources.
Key words: collagen, extraction method, hydrolyzed collagen, bioactive properties, collagen application
*Corresponding Author: Norizah Mhd. Sarbon, Assoc. Professor Ts., Faculty of Fisheries and Food Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia. Email: [email protected]
Academic Editor: BN Dar, PhD, Department of Food Technology, Islamic University of Science & Technology, Awantipora, Kashmir, India
Received: 11 September 2024; Accepted: 7 May 2025; Published: 1 October 2025
© 2025 Codon Publications
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
Collagen, the most prolific animal protein, plays a crucial role in the structural maintenance of different tissues and organs (Shaik et al., 2023). In contrast, hydrolyzed collagen comprises low-molecular weight peptides (Seong et al., 2024). Collagen is an essential structural protein in extracellular matrix, and the term originates from the Greek word ‘kola’, meaning ‘glue making’ (Senadheera et al., 2020). It is a white and opaque protein absent from branched and fibrous chains. It is present in the skin, cartilage, bones, teeth, tendons, ligaments, and blood vessels of animals. Collagen is distinguished by repeated proline-rich tripeptides, such as glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline or hydroxylysine, which are crucial in flexibility characteristics (Hamdan and Sarbon, 2019). Different collagen extraction methods are reported because this is a critical step in enhancing this protein’s yield, purity, and structural integrity while saving time and lowering process costs.
Collagen extraction is done in three ways: acid extraction, alkali extraction, and enzyme extraction (Xu et al., 2022). In acid extraction, several acids are utilized, including organic acids, such as acetic acid, chloroacetic acid, citric acid, and lactic acid, and inorganic acids, such as hydrochloric acid (Hadfi and Sarbon, 2019). Meanwhile, alkali extraction has a high hydrolysis capacity for collagen fibers (Hamdan and Sarbon, 2019). For enzyme extraction, pepsin, papain, and tryptase are common enzymes used to extract collagen protein, where large quantities of hydrolyzed collagen proteins are generated by hydrolysis (Schmidt et al., 2016). In addition, sodium carbonate and magnesium oxide are generally utilized to recover collagen protein from leather waste (Yang and Shu, 2014).
Hydrolyzed collagen, or collagen hydrolysate or collagen peptides, is a form of collagen broken down into more readily soluble amino acids (Gee et al., 2019). Hydrolyzed collagen can increase the food’s functional activity, including water-holding capacity and solubility (Villamil et al., 2017). For instance, hydrolyzed collagen is utilized in processed foods, such as sausages, to substitute for swine fat. As a result, the finished product exhibited a higher water-holding capacity, better after-cooking stability, and enhanced texture-like hardness and chewiness (Sousa et al., 2017). Collagen hydrolysate exhibits exceptional techno-functional properties, including viscosity, emulsifying and foaming abilities, solubility, and water and oil absorption capacities, making it highly valuable for applications in the food and pharmaceutical industries (Tawalbeh et al., 2025). Additionally, hydrolyzed collagen demonstrates excellent functional properties attributed to its bioactive characteristics.
Bioactive is an alternate term for biologically active substance (Ishak and Sarbon, 2018). A bioactive substance is most accurately described as one that seems to impact, trigger a reaction, or prompt response in live cells (Akbarian et al., 2022). Studies have found that the bioactivity of hydrolyzed collagen possesses antifreeze, anticancer, antioxidant, and antihypertensive properties, antimicrobial, self-assembly, and cell-penetrating activities (Xu et al., 2023). It is helpful in various biomedical applications, such as tissue regeneration, tissue engineering, wound healing, and drug delivery, including the design of nanostructures (Furtado et al., 2022). In addition, antioxidants have been proposed as a possible option for treating and preventing illnesses caused by active oxygen species, particularly cancer disorders (Hecht et al., 2024).
Hydrolyzed collagen is applied in various sectors, including food, medicines, biomaterials, and cosmetics (Villamil et al., 2017). Hydrolyzed collagen is used for food applications to treat mineral shortages (Hajj et al., 2024). Marine collagen in the pharmaceutical industry is utilized to prevent bleeding because it has sponge-like structure, is very absorbent, and can store several times its weight in fluid (Salvatore et al., 2020). Meanwhile, as hydrolyzed collagen has low molecular weight and amino acid composition in the biomaterial sector, creating a hydrolyzed collagen biomaterial could be helpful in treating bone and joint diseases. In addition, hydrolyzed collagen is employed as a moisturizer in the cosmetic sector because its moisture absorption and retention capability is superior to that of the control group (glycerol) (Li et al., 2020).
Over the years, intensive research on the uses of collagen has been motivated by the great potential of collagen application. Collagen’s significant sources of industrial exploitation are bovine and porcine, which have raised concerns recently (Senadheera et al., 2020). Different sources of collagen are contested due to religious restrictions regarding the avoidance of porcine and bovine goods as well as the recent massive epidemic of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) (Liu et al., 2022). In this regard, possible halal collagen sources, such as marine and poultry, are investigated to produce halal collagen products. Still a review is needed to discuss various hydrolyzed collagen sources on bioactive properties and potential applications. Therefore, the review aims to unlock hydrolyzed collagen’s production, bioactive properties, and potential applications from different sources. To provide a comprehensive overview of this review, Figure 1 summarizes the interconnected aspects of hydrolyzed collagen, such as its sources, extraction methods, physicochemical and bioactive properties, and diverse applications across various industries.
Figure 1. Overview of hydrolyzed collagen production, properties, and applications.
Collagen is a structural protein found in connective tissues, including the skin, cartilage, tendons, and bones, accounting for 25–30% of all proteins in the body (Miranda et al., 2021). Its molecular structure consists of three polypeptide chains twisted together to form a triple helix of around 300-nm length with a molecular weight of 105 kDa. These molecules can either be homomeric (with identical α chains) or heteromeric (with genetically distinct α chains). Each strand is first generated with left-handed symmetry before being confirmed as a right-handed triple helix (Senadheera et al., 2020).
Each chain in the right-handed helical form comprises a glycine-X-Y repeating sequence, where X and Y are frequently referred to as proline or hydroxyproline (Islam and Mis Solval, 2025). All glycine residues are found in the core of this motif, whereas other amino acids (X and Y) are positioned on the surface (Senadheera et al., 2020). Interchain N-H (Gly) O=C(x) hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interaction reinforce this stiff rod-like structure. A triple helix is the most distinguishing aspect of the collagen structure. On the other hand, the triple helix might vary depending on the type of collagen in the system (Fidler et al., 2018). Additionally, this sequential homogeneity is uncommon in other proteins. Because of collagen’s uniformity, several investigations have examined its potential as a future biomaterial with many uses.
Collagen is a unique and essential structural protein composed of three intertwined α-helical chains that form a triple helix (Figure 2). Each chain contains repeating sequences of three amino acids: glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline, which provide stability and strength (Shaik et al., 2024b). Each collagen molecule has a molecular weight of approximately 360 kDa, a length of 28 nm, and comprises about 1,000 amino acids per chain (Schmidt et al., 2016). To date, researchers have been identified 28 types of collagens (Type I– XXVIII), categorized based on their discovery (Hajj et al., 2024).
Figure 2. Structure of collagen.
Tropocollagen, a three-stranded polypeptide molecule, is the primary component of collagen. Owing to its wide structural variety, the collagen family is divided into several divisions (Wang et al., 2014). Different helix lengths, including non-helical components, helix interruptions, alterations in the basic polypeptide chain assembly, and variations in helical domain terminations, contribute directly to many collagens. The basic collagen types include fibrillar collagen, short-chain collagen, beaded filament collagen, fibril associated collagens with interrupted triple helices (FACIT), FACIT-like collagen, basement membrane collagens, transmembrane collagens, and unclassified collagens (Gordon and Hahn, 2010). The helix length and fraction of non-helical components vary with collagen type.
Numerous studies have revealed that type I collagen is the most frequent form found in the fibrillar group (Amirrah et al., 2022). The fibril-producing collagen, known as fibrillar collagen, is produced by the fibrillogenic process as soluble precursor molecules (procollagen). Each polypeptide chain comprising N- and C-propeptides at the end of the triple helix contributes to the process of synthesis (Senadheera et al., 2020). The fibrils that develop have a noticeable banding caused by the collagen aggregating pattern. The stability of fibrillar collagen is based on nonreducible covalent cross-links within the triple helix (Senadheera et al., 2020).
Collagen contributes about 30% of the body protein because most animals’ primary structural proteins are in the bones and skin (Pal and Suresh, 2016). Therefore, collagen could be acquired from natural and synthetic sources (Rezvani Ghomi et al., 2021). The by-products obtained from slaughterhouses, such as bones, tendons, hides, cartilages, and recombinant collagen, are most often used as raw materials for synthesis of collagen. In industrial-scale processing, bovines and pigs are significant sources of collagen (Amyoony et al., 2023). According to Introspective Market Research (2023), the global production of collagen in 2023 was reported to be 1,060 metric tons and is expected to reach 1,820 metric tons by 2032. Similarly, Grand View Research (2023) estimated the global collagen market at USD9.76 billion. It is projected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.6% between 2024 and 2030. Moreover, with the increasing demand, it is essential to find more sustainable and cost-effective sources of collagen (Gaikwad and Kim, 2024). However, development of prion diseases, such as BSE has posed numerous challenges in using bovine collagen. On the other hand, swine flu has restricted the utilization of pig collagen (Senadheera et al., 2020).
Marine collagen is a practical alternative for bovine and porcine collagens because of the widespread occurrence of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), avian influenza-like diseases, and BSE as well as various religious and societal restrictions (Dave et al., 2019). In addition, marine collagen is preferred above other alternative sources in many industrial applications because of its unique biomaterial characteristic with exceptional biocompatibility and biodegradability (Shahidi et al., 2019). Specifically, marine by-products have been employed in several bioprocessing methods to extract collagen and other collagen-related polymers (Dave and Routray, 2018).
Compared to collagen extraction from land-origin species, collagen extraction from marine is far less complex and time-consuming as well as affordable (Rajabimashhadi et al., 2023). According to the available data, collagen recovered from marine vertebrates is primarily type I collagen (Table 1). Type I collagen is obtained from most species’ skins, tendons, bones, and muscles. Meanwhile, type II collagen is obtained from fish cartilages (Benjakul et al., 2012). According to Table 1, collagens are mainly isolated from skin tissues of most species because of increased concentration of collagen. Numerous marine species have been studied for collagen extraction, such as sea bass (Kim et al., 2012), lizard fish, yellowback seabream (Minh-Thuy et al., 2014), bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) (Ahmed et al., 2019), fringe scale sardinella (Hamdan and Sarbon, 2019), clown featherback (Petcharat et al., 2020), cuttlefish (Sepia pharaonic) (Hazeena et al., 2022), barracuda (Sphyraena sp.) (Matarsim et al., 2023), parrotfish (Scarus sordidus) (Jaziri et al., 2023), blue shark (Prionace glauca) (Pan et al., 2023). Research on using collagen from Ameiurus nebulosus skins in mayonnaise (Wang et al., 2013) and the characterization of marine eel-fish collagen (Veeruraj et al., 2015) are reported. Collagen from the skin of catfish (Heteropneustus teropfossilis), mullet fish (Mugil cephalus), and Indian salmon (Eleutheronema tertradactylum) are researched as well for its potential use as an emulsifier and foam stabilization agent in food processing (Kumar et al., 2019).
Table 1. Collagen type and total collagen content based on different sources.
| Sources of collagen | Species | Body part | Total collagen content (%) | Type of collagen | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marine | Blue Shark (Prionace glauca) |
Cartilage | – | Type II | Pan et al.,2023 |
| Cuttlefish (Sepia pharaonis) |
Skin | 8.79 | Type I | Hazeena et al.,2022 | |
| Barracuda (Sphyraena sp.) |
Skin | 10.06 | Type I | Matarsim et al.,2023 | |
| Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) |
Skin | 23.84 | Type I | Heidari and Rezaei, 2022 | |
| Sponge (Aplysina fulva) |
Body | 43.9 | Type I | Batista et al.,2022 | |
| Lizardfish (Synodus macrops) |
Scales | 4.7 | Type I | Chen et al.,2021 | |
| Clown featherback (Chitala ornata) |
Skin | 80.81 | Type I | Petcharat et al., 2020 | |
| Shortfin scad | Bones and skin | 3.45 | Type I | Sulaiman and Sarbon, 2020 | |
| Jellyfish (Rhopilema esculentum) |
Filament | 4.31 | Type 1 | Ferrario et al., 2020 | |
| Mesoglea | 0.40 | Cheng et al., 2017 | |||
| Sea cucumber (Holothuria cinerans) |
Body wall | 72.20 | Type I | Li et al., 2020 | |
| Golden pompano (Trachinotus blochii) |
Skin Bone |
21.81 1.25 |
Type I | Cao et al., 2019 | |
| Starfish (Acanthaster planci) | Body wall | 2.26 | Type I | Wijanarko et al., 2017 | |
| Squid (Kondakovia longimana) |
Muscle | 1.05 | Type I | Coelho et al., 2017 | |
| 2.12 | |||||
| Land mammals | Goat | Shoulder | 2.49 | Type I | LaRoche et al., 2022 |
| 3.06 | |||||
| 1.78 | |||||
| Bull | Hides | 109.95* | Type I | Noorzai et al., 2020 | |
| Calf | 110.92 | ||||
| Cow | 105.83 | ||||
| Lamb | Slaughter by-products | 12.50 | Type I | Vidal et al., 2020 | |
| Sheep | 18.00 | ||||
| Poultry | Spent-hens | Bones | 9.63 | Type II | Cao et al., 2023a |
| Broiler chicken | Stomach | 9.8 | Type I | Prokopová et al., 2022 | |
| Chicken | Sternal cartilage | 20.59 | Type II | Akram and Zhang, 2020 | |
| Feet | 32.16 | Type I | Dhakal et al.,2018 | ||
| Feet | 42.67 | Type I | Mokhtar et al., 2017 | ||
| Lungs | 31.25 | Type II | Zou et al., 2020 | ||
| Quail | Feet | Not evaluated | Type I | Yousefi et al., 2017 | |
| Duck | Feet | Not evaluated | Type I and II | Kim et al., 2016 |
*The collagen content is given as a percentage of either a wet or dry basis.
Land mammals, such as bovine, porcine, goats, elephants, and monkeys, are good sources of collagen. Generally, type I collagen is extracted from the bones and skins of bovine and porcine (Hamdan and Sarbon, 2019). Bovine and porcine are essential sources of collagen for the industrial sector (Hadfi and Sarbon, 2019). Bovine collagen is the most common source of synthetic collagen used in beauty, pharmaceutical, and non-biomedical products (Rizk and Mostafa, 2016). Apart from the possibility of BSE, roughly 3% of the population is intolerant to bovine collagen. This intolerance is primarily due to allergic or hypersensitive reactions and digestive discomfort, resulting in its limited usage (Silvipriya et al., 2015). Porcine collagen is extracted from pig skin and bones (Silvipriya et al., 2015). Pig rind is well known for its application in manufacturing culinary items, such as edible films and sausage casings.
Furthermore, porcine collagen is frequently used in dermal replacement treatment, particularly for reconstructive surgery implants (Salvatore et al., 2023). Pig skin-extracted type-I collagen has properties of human collagen and has various applications in the medical and culinary sectors (Maione-Silva et al., 2019). However, collagen derived from porcine and bovine is associated with allergic reactions and various diseases, including BSE, FMD, scrapie in ovine and caprine, and other zoonotic infections.
Compared to the collagen derived from bovine and porcine sources, poultry collagen enjoys broader consumer acceptance across various belief systems (Jayaprakash et al., 2024). Collagen can be extracted from different poultry species, such as chickens, ducks, turkeys, and geese. It is claimed that collagen can be derived from poultry’s by-products as well, such as bones, skin, and cartilage. Furthermore, for Muslims, chicken is not subjected to any religious restrictions, except that it must be slaughtered in a halal manner (Goyal et al., 2013). However, due to the emergence of avian influenza, use of poultry as a collagen source has been restricted (Maione-Silva et al., 2019).
For example, chicken sternal cartilage is used to extract type II collagen (Akram and Zhang, 2020). In contrast, spent-hen’s feet (Cao et al., 2023a), broiler chicken’s stomach (Prokopová et al., 2022), chicken’s sternal cartilage (Akram and Zhang, 2020), quail’s feet (Yousefi et al., 2017), duck’s feet (Kim et al., 2016), and chicken’s skin and bones (Munasinghe et al., 2015) are used to extract type I collagen. Chicken foot collagen is used to produce jelly drinks, which is a well-received product by consumers (Almeida et al., 2012). Compared to calfskin and pig skin collagen, type I collagen produced from quail feet appears to have more significant structural and thermal stability. As a result, it could be used as an alternative to mammalian collagen in biomaterials, functional foods, cosmetics, and medicines (Yousefi et al., 2017). However, mammalian collagen is favored over avian collagen for industrial applications. Expensive and complex extraction procedure correlates with the restricted use of avian collagen (Senadheera et al., 2020).
Collagen preparation methods involve a series of crucial steps, such as pretreatment, extraction, separation, purification, and characterization. The cross-linked collagen in animal connective tissue degrades slowly, even in hot water, due to its inherent properties. Hence, a mild chemical treatment is indispensable to disrupt these cross-links before extraction (Schmidt et al., 2016). This step, using low-concentrated acids and bases, is vital, as it partially hydrolyzes collagen, preserving collagen chains while breaking cross-links (Prestes, 2015). The removal of covalent intra- and intermolecular cross-links is a key aspect of collagen extraction (Schmidt et al., 2016). The extraction of collagen involves pretreatment of raw material, with the preparation method varying according to the type of raw material.
In collagen extraction techniques, acidic and alkaline pretreatments are commonly utilized (Sorushanova et al., 2019). Since collagen has a cross-linked structure, pretreatment is typically performed before extraction. This allows the collagen to be extracted with fewer cross-linking points (Schmidt et al., 2016). In contrast, the primary solution in alkaline pretreatment eliminates non-collagenous proteins, lipids, colors, calcium, and other inorganic substances. Removing non-collagenous components from alkaline solutions depends on various factors, such as temperature (Silva et al., 2014). According to Schmidt et al. (2016), NaOH at a concentration of 0.05–0.10 M is acceptable for pretreatment. Moreover, temperatures ranging from 4°C to 20°C and the same concentration range inhibit acid-soluble collagen and cause structural alterations. While at 15°C and 20°C, 0.5 M NaOH produces structural changes, whereas 0.2 M and 0.5 M NaOH induce loss of acid-soluble collagen. Additionally, the alkaline method treats thick and hard raw materials for intense penetration to dissolve inter- and intramolecular cross-links of collagens (Schmidt et al., 2016).
Demineralization is eliminating mineral salts from basic materials, such as calcium. This technique is frequently required for raw materials with high mineral content, such as the bones, cartilages, and scales, to improve the efficacy and purity of extracted collagen (Jafari et al., 2020). In addition, the demineralized raw material has a porous structure with a larger surface area, making the collagen extraction process easier (Silva et al., 2014). Researchers investigated ethylene-diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), hydrochloric acid (HCl), formic acid (CH2O2), and a combination of ETDA and HCl as demineralization agents (Pang et al., 2021). HCl is the most effective demineralization agent, as it rapidly removes a significant portion of mineral content while preserving collagen structure. EDTA is identical to HCl in mineral removal and preservation of collagen integrity. However, treating with EDTA is a lengthy process (Park et al., 2017). Based on surface data, CH2O2 worked best but failed to demineralize the inside portion of a sample (Hamed et al., 2012).
Defatting is a method of removing fat from raw materials with a high fat content. This can be done by immersing raw material in alcohol solution. To acquire high-purity collagen, defatting must be carried out. Three techniques for defatting of raw material were tested using NaHCO3, lipolytic enzyme, and 10 different solvent systems (Mrázek et al., 2018). Defatting with NaHCO3 solution yields raw material’s leftover fat content, making it ineffective for future usage. The yield of residual fat content using enzyme-based approach grew significantly, reaching a relatively high value compared to the raw material’s initial fat content (Mrázek et al., 2018). The amount of enzyme used and the processing duration had no discernible influence on process efficiency (Nilsuwan et al., 2021). The most efficient technique for defatting of the material is using a combination of ethanol and petroleum ether (the mixture was swapped for three times). The residual fat content was roughly 5%. The final product reported below is particularly collagen-rich (Mrázek et al., 2018). Additionally, different raw material–solvent ratios (usually 1:10) and treatment periods were used to remove fat content.
There are two types of chemical hydrolysis of collagen: acid hydrolysis and alkali hydrolysis. Acidic solutions are used commonly, where organic and inorganic acids dissolve connections between collagen molecules, facilitating the extraction of collagen fibril. In addition, collagen molecules acquire a positive charge in acidic conditions (Yang and Shu, 2014), thus aiding their solubility by causing repulsion between tropocollagen molecules (Pal and Suresh, 2016). To isolate collagen, organic acids, such as acetic acid, citric acid, lactic acid, and chloroacetic acid, as well as inorganic acids, such as hydrochloric acid, are employed (Hukmi and Sarbon, 2018). Organic acids are generally more effective than inorganic acids in breaking the cross-links of collagen molecules, thereby improving collagen extraction. However, acetic acid is widely used due to its ability to alter collagen electrostatic properties, thereby enhancing its solubility and extractability (Islam and Mis Solval, 2025).
In general, 0.5 M acetic acid is often used for acid hydrolysis, and the reaction mixture is continually agitated for 24–72 h (Ran and Wang, 2014). Then, the mixture undergoes sequential filtering, precipitation with NaCl, and centrifugation to obtain crude collagen powder. The filtrate should subsequently dissolve in 0.5 M acetic acid, and after 2 days of dialysis in 0.1 M acetic acid, it is distilled for another 2 days (Devita et al., 2021). Similar findings were reported where the yield of extracted collagen from shortfin scad bone using 0.7 M acetic acid was higher (1.31%) than 0.5 M acetic acid (1.01%). These findings could be attributed to a more vital electrostatic repulsive force between single nominal charged groups in collagen extracted with 0.7 M acetic acid, compared to 0.5 M acetic acid (Baderi and Sarbon, 2019). Some extraction parameters differ depending on the type of raw material, as summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. Studies related to different extraction methods with various parameters.
| Extraction methods | Source | Body part | Hydrolysis parameter | Extraction solvent | Yield (%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemical method | Cobia (Rachycentron canadum) | Skin | Temperature: 4°C Period: 24 h Ratio (w/v): 1:10 |
0.5M lactic acid | 36.70 | Sukeri et al., 2021 |
| 1.0M lactic acid | 22.23 | |||||
| Shortfin scad (Decapterus macrosoma) | Bone | Temperature: 4°C Period: 24 h Ratio (w/v): 1:5 |
0.5M acetic acid | 1.01 | Baderi and Sarbon, 2019 | |
| 0.7M acetic acid | 1.31 | |||||
| Fringescale sardinella (Sardinella fimbriata) | Waste material | Temperature: 4°C Period: 24 h Ratio (w/v): 1:2 |
0.5M acetic acid | 7.48 | Hamdan and Sarbon, 2019 | |
| Medusa fish (Centrolophus niger) | Skin | Temperature: 4°C Period: 72 h Ratio (w/v): 1:25 |
0.5M lactic acid | 45.00 | Bhuimbar et al., 2019 | |
| 0.5M formic acid | 32.00 | |||||
| 0.5M tartaric acid | 31.00 | |||||
| 0.5M citric acid | 31.00 | |||||
| 0.5M acetic acid | 25.00 | |||||
| Enzymatic method | Shortfin scad (Decapterus macrosoma) |
Waste material | Temperature: 4°C Period: 30 h |
0.5 M acetic acid with 1.5% (w/w) pepsin | 0.10 | Sulaiman and Sarbon, 2020 |
| Sharp nose stingray (Dasyatis zugei) | Skin | Temperature: 4°C Period: 30 h Ratio (w/v): 1:40 |
0.5 M acetic acid with 1.5% (w/w) pepsin | 34.84 | Ong et al., 2020 | |
| Golden carp (Probarbus jullieni) |
Skin | Temperature: 4°C Period: 48 h Ratio (w/v): 1:15 |
0.5 M acetic acid with 1.0% (w/w) pepsin | 79.29 | Ali et al., 2018 | |
| Miiuy croaker (Miichthys miiuy) | Scales | Temperature: 4°C Period: 48 h Ratio (w/v): 1:15 |
0.5 M acetic acid with 1.0% (w/w) pepsin | 3.87 | Li et al., 2018 |
Moreover, citric acid and lactic acid have shown promising collagen yields, particularly if used in combination with enzymatic treatments; 0.5 M lactic acid and citric acid are used to extract 90% and 60% of collagen, respectively, from the skin of Baltic cod treated at 4°C for 48–72 h (Skierka and Sadowska, 2007). However, the yield dropped significantly to 18% with 0.15 M HCl under similar conditions, resulting in the lower efficiency of HCl for collagen extraction. Similarly, collagen isolated from the skin of black ruff fish achieved a yield of 45% with 0.5 M lactic acid and 31% with 0.5 M citric acid, whereas treatment with HCl resulted in negligible extraction yield, attributed to its limited efficiency (Bhuimbar et al., 2019). A recent study conducted by Hasanuddin et al. (2024) reported that acid-soluble collagen extracted from the bones and fins of purple-spotted bigeye exhibited the highest yield (1.93%) with 0.5 M citric acid, followed by a yield of 1.43% with 0.5 M lactic acid. These findings light-tight the effectiveness of citric acid and lactic acid as viable alternatives for collagen extraction compared to HCl.
Alkali hydrolysis uses robust alkali solutions to dissolve and break down collagen (Pal and Suresh, 2016). Commonly used alkalis include sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, and extractants such as calcium hydroxide, calcium oxide, and sodium carbonate. Additionally, alkali has a high potential for hydrolysis. It may hydrolyze proteins by acting on collagen fibrils, although under severe extraction conditions, amino acids, such as cysteine, histidine, serine, and threonine, may be destroyed (Wu et al., 2017). The problem with chemical collagen hydrolysis is that increasing acid or alkaline conditions to lower molecular weight often leads to a higher yield of free amino acids. Furthermore, alkali and alkaline processes are very corrosive to equipment, resulting in a high salt concentration in the final product upon neutralization (Hong et al., 2019).
Enzymes are a relatively ideal technique for extracting collagen proteins. This is because enzymes are more selective in their reactions and less damaging to amino acid residues. Various proteolytic enzymes are utilized in enzymatic extraction process, sourced from animals (pepsin and trypsin), plants (papain, bromelain, and ficin), or commercially available alternatives (Alcalase, proteinase K, collagenase, Nutrase, Flavoenzyme, and Protamex). Pepsin from animal sources is the most used enzyme (Pal and Suresh, 2017).
Pepsin is the most often employed enzyme for collagen (gelatin) extraction because it cleaves collagen telopeptides containing most intermolecular cross-links. This cleavage allows collagen to be digested more readily into low-molecular weight peptides (Hong et al., 2019). Furthermore, because pepsin removes antigenic telopeptide region, pepsin digestion may diminish antigenicity. Finally, pepsin proved the most effective enzyme for preserving collagen’s Gly-X-Y repeating structure (Yu et al., 2018). Compared to heat extraction alone, pepsin enhanced gelatin production from bovine lung tissue by approximately nine times (Roy et al., 2017).
Heating is another method utilized for collagen extraction. By disrupting collagen’s hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonds, heat increases the kinetic energy of molecules, causing vibrations that break the bonds holding collagen structure together (Hong et al., 2019). Collagen has traditionally been extracted using heat. Common enzymes, such as trypsin, collagenase, proteinase K, and thermolysin, enhanced hydrolysis when bovine collagen was boiled for 5 min (Zhang et al., 2013). However, heating is less effective for extracting collagen from strongly cross-linked animal tissues, such as wasted hen skin. Pyrrole and pyridinoline, covalently attached to collagen molecules, were discovered to be the cross-links (Hong et al., 2019).
Another method used to extract collagen is ultrasonication. Developed as an alternative to traditional processes, ultrasonication aims to reduce processing time and increase extraction yield (Kim et al., 2012; Shaik et al., 2021a). Ultrasound operates at a high frequency (20 kHz), beyond human hearing capabilities (16 kHz), using sound wave energy for mass transfer in a wet process (Schmidt et al., 2016; Shaik et al., 2021b). A study considered the effect of the combinational approach of pepsin with ultrasound-assisted extraction for bovine tendon-derived collagen and discovered that the extraction efficiency was higher with improved collagen quality (Ran and Wang, 2014). Another study found that the combination might boost yield while decreasing the time required (Li et al., 2018). As a recent approach, ultrasound-assisted extraction offers advantages over traditional extraction methods, including the absence of complex procedures, being environment-friendly, safe to use, quick processing time, and economically feasible.
While traditional and conventional techniques for collagen extraction have been established for a long, recent research highlights the emergence of several advanced methods for obtaining collagen from diverse sources. These innovative approaches, including deep eutectic solvent (DES) extraction, microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), mechanical agitation, and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), are garnering significant attention (Kıyak et al., 2024).
Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) are particularly noteworthy as sustainable and environmentally benign alternatives to conventional organic solvents for collagen extraction from natural sources (Farooq et al., 2024). DESs are complex ionic liquids formed by combining a hydrogen bond acceptor, such as quaternary ammonium salt, with a hydrogen bond donor, such as carboxylic acid or an amine (He et al., 2024). These solvents have demonstrated efficacy in extracting a broad spectrum of bioactive compounds from natural materials due to their low toxicity, biodegradability, and ability to solubilize various compounds. Notably, DESs can minimize the risk of collagen denaturation and enhance the quality of the extracted collagen. For instance, a study conducted by Bisht et al. (2021) reported obtaining higher yields of type I collagen from Atlantic codfish (Gadus morhua) using DESs with different combinations (urea–lactic acid and urea–propionic acid), compared to traditional acetic acid extraction. Silva et al. (2024) reported high-quality collagen extracted from codfish (Gadus morhua) skin using DESs with urea–propanoic acid mixture (in 1:2 ratio). Similarly, 90% effective collagen was extracted from cod skin by using a DESs composed of comprising choline chloride and oxalic acid (Bai et al., 2017).
Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) has gained widespread usage due to its advantages, such as increased extraction yields, enhanced selectivity, improved fractionation capabilities, and environment-friendly operation (Barzkar et al., 2023). This method selectively separates bioactive components using a supercritical fluid as an extracting solvent. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the widely used supercritical fluid in SFE due to its exceptional properties, such as low toxicity, chemical stability, high availability, cost-effectiveness, non-flammability, environment acceptability, and less operating conditions (typically near its critical point) (Gutierrez-Canul et al., 2025). A recent study conducted by Sousa et al. (2020) demonstrated the efficacy of SFE using CO2 to extract collagen from Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) skins, achieving a high yield of 13.8%.
Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) uses electromagnetic waves to disrupt efficiently the cellular structures of biological materials, thereby boosting the extraction of target compounds (Fauziyah et al., 2023; Islam and Mis Solval, 2025). This technique allows microwave radiation to penetrate deeply into protein matrices, weakening cell walls, and facilitating the release of desired molecules (Zin et al., 2025). The interaction of microwaves with polar substances generates heat through molecular friction, effectively using microwaves as an internal heat source (Feng et al., 2022). Notably, MAE has been shown to enhance collagen yield from European plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) byproducts such as the skin, head, and backbone, particularly when combined with pretreatments, such as enzyme hydrolysis and salt-washing (Kendler et al., 2023). Furthermore, Jin et al. (2019) demonstrated that MAE hydrolysis of collagen from sea cucumber (Acaudina molpadioides) yielded extracts with significant bioactivities, including antioxidant properties.
Advanced collagen extraction methods are established for their potential to enhance yield kinetics, minimize protein denaturation, preserve native bioactivity, increase product purity, and offer more environment-sustainable approaches. However, realizing the full potential of these methods necessitates comprehensive studies to address challenges related to process optimization and the stability of collagen during extraction from diverse biological sources. Furthermore, the considerable initial capital investment required for specialized equipment capable of maintaining specific operating parameters, coupled with increased operational complexity, warrants careful consideration by researchers.
Using enzymes to extract collagen is a common practice and is recognized as one of the most practical biological approaches for commercial use (Schmidt et al., 2016). The enzymatic extraction technique was developed to enhance collagen yield due to its high reaction selectivity and lesser negative impact on collagen’s molecular structure (Yang and Shu, 2014). Furthermore, enzymatic hydrolysis is more efficient than chemical hydrolysis, as it has more advantageous features due to the milder process conditions (pH 6.0–8.0 and temperature 40–60°C) (Nasri, 2017). Despite its higher cost, enzymatic hydrolysis offers several advantages over chemical hydrolysis, including high specificity, moderate reaction conditions, controlled degree of hydrolysis, lowest salt content in final hydrolysate, reduced waste output, and a higher collagen yield (Senadheera et al., 2020).
Over the past 60 years, numerous researchers have identified and documented enzymatic proteolysis from plant and animal sources. This approach is widely used to add value to underutilized species. Common commercial enzymes used for preparing collagen hydrolysates include Papain, alcalase, α-chymotrypsin, Neutrase, pepsin, flavourzyme, trypsin, collagenase, and bromelain (Ong et al., 2021). Pepsin from animal sources is the most commonly utilized enzyme (Pal and Suresh, 2017). Pepsin can cleave the non-helix peptide chain of collagen protein at the three-quarters position of N-terminus, leaving intact the helix peptide chains of collagen (Yang and Shu, 2014). However, compared to single-enzyme hydrolysis, multi-enzyme hydrolysis yielded more molecular weight in collagen peptides.
Protein hydrolysis in an acidic environment is a reliable method for obtaining peptides and amino acids. Organic acids, such as acetic acid, lactic acid, citric acid, formic acid, and inorganic acids, including hydrochloric acid (HCl), can be used for acid hydrolysis (Schmidt et al., 2016). For example, HCl hydrolysis is often used to determine the amino acid content of proteins. However, it has the disadvantage of complete or partial destruction of tryptophan, tyrosine, serine, and threonine in extreme circumstances, such as 6.0 M concentration at 110°C for 20 h (Hong et al., 2019). Formic acid is preferred for collagen hydrolysis because it enters collagen molecules more quickly, is less corrosive to equipment than HCl or sulfuric acid, and cleaves Asp residues commonly found on cross-linked telopeptides. In addition, formic acid also kills viruses and germs in raw materials and may be separated for reuse. Finally, no inorganic salts are added to the hydrolysate (Hong et al., 2018).
Alkaline hydrolysis is employed to break down various proteins to determine their amino acid contents, especially tryptophan, which is eliminated by acid hydrolysis (Senadheera et al., 2020). Researchers have developed a rapid and sensitive method for quantifying collagen using alkaline hydrolysis, with a NaOH concentration of 7 mol/L used as a standard (Hong et al., 2019). However, a significant issue arises due to the chemical hydrolysis of collagen, which lowers molecular weight by increasing acid or alkaline conditions, typically resulting in a larger yield of free amino acids. This problem underscores the need for further research and development in this area. Furthermore, the acid and alkali procedures are very corrosive to equipment and result in a high salt concentration in the final product upon neutralization (Hong et al., 2019).
Subcritical water hydrolysis, a method that operates within a temperature range of 100–374°C and a pressure of 0.1–22 MPa, is gaining popularity as an eco-friendly alternative to protein hydrolysis. This approach, which does not involve the use of chemicals or the generation of salt or hazardous waste, offers a rapid reaction time. The process is facilitated by the production of hydrogen (H3O+) and hydroxide (OH) ions, which act as catalysts under subcritical conditions (100°C at 0.10 MPa to 374°C at 22 MPa) (Powell et al., 2017).
Subcritical water hydrolysis is utilized in research to manufacture collagen hydrolysates from various sources. For example, Ahn et al. (2017) used an electric heater with 1.1 MPa pressure to heat a pressure chamber containing tuna skin to 190°C for 10 min. The resultant collagen hydrolysates had a molecular weight of 500 to 3000 Da. Jo et al. (2015) evaluated peptide yield from pig skin after sub- and supercritical water treatment. Subcritical water (300°C at 8 MPa) was marginally more successful than supercritical water (400°C at 280 MPa) in hydrolyzing porcine skin into low-molecular weight peptides (less than 1 kDa) within a short time (1 h). On the other hand, subcritical water hydrolysis entails the highest energy cost and requires the most advanced equipment, compared to enzymatic and chemical hydrolysis. Another disadvantage of subcritical water hydrolysis is the potential alteration in amino acid side chains following subcritical water treatment (Powell et al., 2017).
Collagen is mainly composed of proteins but contains trace amounts of other elements, such as moisture, ash, and fat. Therefore, to determine the purity of collagen, it is necessary to first establish its composition. The chemical composition of collagen is influenced by its sources, extraction process, and solvent. Table 3 shows the chemical composition of various sources of hydrolyzed collagens.
Table 3. Chemical composition of hydrolyzed collagen from various sources.
| Source | Body part | Hydrolysis method | Chemical composition (%) | References | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture | Protein | Fat | Ash | ||||
| Snakehead fish (Channa striata) | Skin | ND | 74.33 | 18.49 | 2.99 | 0.20 | Rosmawati et al., 2018 |
| Bone | 43.19 | 15.9 | 4.19 | 32.05 | |||
| Sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) salmon | Head | Thermal hydrolysis | 3.89 | 3.58 | 0.03 | 0.29 | Abuine et al., 2019 |
| Head | Enzymatic-thermal hydrolysis | 6.71 | 6.21 | 0.07 | 0.43 | ||
| Velvet elk (Cervus elaphus canadensis) | Antler | Enzymatic hydrolysis | 27.7 | 51.37 | 2.82 | 26.09 | Kim et al., 2016 |
| Chicken | Feet | Enzymatic hydrolysis | 3.78 | 91.38 | 17.35 | 4.84 | Kodous, 2020 |
ND = no data presented by the researcher.
Hydrolyzed collagen from snakehead (Channa striata) fish has the highest amount of moisture (74.33%) compared to other sources (Rosmawati et al. 2018) (Table 3). Lipid is one of the constituent of both skin and bone. The lipid content of fish bone is higher than that of the skin, which is also true for the leather jacket fish. Lipids must be removed during processing operations, particularly during bone extraction into gelatin. Lipids can lower the grade of gelatin generated, which is usually accomplished by a degreasing process (Abuine et al. 2019). The snakehead fish bone’s ash content is higher than that of the skin. A high ash level suggested a high mineral mass in the bone to represent mineral content, yet skin leather jacket fish ash was more significant than its bone (Rosmawati et al. 2018). This was based on the skin’s thickness and biochemical composition.
Collagen, the most abundant protein in the human body, mainly comprises amino acids glycine (33%), proline (12%), and hydroxyproline (10%) in a triplex helix composed of three chains (primary structure) (Thirukumaran et al., 2022). Each alpha chain comprises 1,014 amino acids and has a molecular weight of approximately 100 kDa (León-López et al., 2019a). Collagens differ in their chain composition, controlled by the repeat and length of the Gly–X–Y amino acid sequence, with and without interruptions. The occupancy of X and Y positions by proline and its hydroxylated analog, hydroxyproline, plays a role in this variation (Sorushanova et al., 2019). It is important to know the amino acid composition of collagen, as this represents structural characteristics and significantly influence collagen’s physicochemical properties (Luo et al., 2020). Table 4 shows the amino acid composition of hydrolyzed collagen from various sources.
Table 4. Amino acid composition based on different sources (residue/1,000 amino acid residue).
| Sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) head | Sheep hides | Chicken feet | Red seabream (Pagrus major) skin | Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) | Snake head (Channa striata) skin | Common carp (Cyprinus carpio) skin | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thermal hydrolysis | Enzymatic-thermal hydrolysis | Enzymatic hydrolysis | Enzymatic hydrolysis | Acidic extraction | Acidic extraction | Acid soluble | Acid soluble | |
| Aspartic acid (Asp) | 0 | 0.01 | 28.03 | 42.2 | 28.4 | 29.6 | 54.0 | 53.1 |
| Threonine (Thr) | 2.63 | 2.49 | 3.18 | 48.9 | 21.3 | 21.2 | 22.0 | 26.6 |
| Serine (Ser) | 3.35 | 3.98 | 13.72 | 33.2 | 28.8 | 31.1 | 35.0 | 38.5 |
| Glutamic acid (Glu) | 10.97 | 8.16 | 38.21 | 85.3 | 50.4 | 49.1 | 74.0 | 74.0 |
| Glycine (Gly) | 17.38 | 9.78 | 1.92 | 330.2 | 400.2 | 399.6 | 307.0 | 318.2 |
| Alanine (Ala) | 6.68 | 5.51 | 0.14 | 131.18 | 131.8 | 128.0 | 89.0 | 119.0 |
| Cysteine (Cys) | 0.11 | 0.22 | 0.13 | – | - | - | 2.0 | 1.5 |
| Valine (Val) | – | 2.79 | 1.53 | 20.1 | 15.1 | 17.4 | 26.0 | 24.1 |
| Methionine (Met) | 2.24 | 2.06 | 1.36 | 12.3 | 11.6 | 12.6 | 12.0 | 12.8 |
| Isoleucine (Ile) | 2.06 | 2.72 | 0.27 | 8.3 | 5.5 | 7.5 | 9.0 | 13.3 |
| Leucine (Leu) | 2.84 | 4.49 | 0.24 | 20.4 | 16.3 | 15.9 | 28.0 | 26.8 |
| Tyrosine (Tyr) | 0.85 | 1.49 | 0.78 | 1.02 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 5.0 | 5.6 |
| Phenylalanine (Phe) | 2.44 | 2.21 | 0.87 | 11.3 | 11.1 | 11.5 | 18.0 | 14.4 |
| Hydrolysine (Hyl) | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | 6.0 | - |
| Lysine (Lys) | 4.38 | 4.82 | 2.05 | 30.1 | 21.5 | 21.6 | 31.0 | 29.4 |
| Histidine (His) | 1.48 | 1.54 | 3.95 | 9.1 | 3.8 | 5.3 | 6.0 | 10.7 |
| Arginine (Arg) | 7.01 | 4.79 | 2.68 | 5.6 | 57.1 | 56.0 | 56.0 | 51.7 |
| Hydroxyproline (Hyp) | 4.74 | 2.31 | 18.06 | 6.6 | 48.9 | 46.8 | 94.0 | 70.2 |
| Proline (Pro) | 6.21 | 4.88 | 0.13 | 120.3 | 146.0 | 144.8 | 126.0 | 109.9 |
| References | Abuine et al., 2019 | León-López et al., 2019a | Kodous, 2020 | Son et al.,2022 | Truong et al.,2021 | Rýglová et al.,2023 | ||
Viscosity is the consistency of fluid flow and is determined in Pascal-second (Pa. s) using a viscometer (Wei et al., 2019). Collagen’s viscosity is determined by its denaturation temperature (Td), the temperature at which the triple helix structure dissolves into irregular coils in a solvent or solution (Zheng et al., 2024). Owing to the damaged hydrogen link in collagen molecules, the viscosity of collagen reduced with increasing temperature, causing the triple helix structure to disintegrate and convert into random coils (Chen et al., 2019). Table 5 summarizes the previous research data. Hydrolyzed collagen from sheepskin showed a viscosity of 4,576 centipoise (Cp) after 1 h of hydrolysis with trypsin, compared to 6,800 Cp at 0 min (León-López et al., 2019b). The existence of a high amount of molecular weight and chains could explain increased viscosity.
Table 5. Physicochemical properties of different sources of collagen hydrolysate.
| Sources | Body part | Hydrolysis method | Physicochemical properties | References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viscosity | Thermal stability | Solubility | ||||
| Brownstripe red snapper (Lutjanus vitta) | Skin | Chemical hydrolysis | ND | 31.52oC | 32.5% | Jongjareonrak et al., 2005 |
| Sheep | Hides | Enzymatic hydrolysis | 4,576 cp | 137.91oC | ND | León-López et al., 2019a |
| Chicken | Feet | Enzymatic hydrolysis | 5.14 mpa.s | ND | 75.12% | Kodous, 2020 |
ND = no data presented by the researcher.
Protein stability refers to the capacity of a protein to maintain its primary structure despite extreme conditions (Pucci and Rooman, 2017). Furthermore, one of the essential variables in assessing the possible application of collagen is its temperature stability. The composition of amino acids directly influences collagen’s physical and chemical characteristics, particularly heat stability. Hydroxyproline’s hydroxyl groups form hydrogen bonds that strengthen triple helix structure’s stability (Zhong et al., 2015). Pepsin- and acid-soluble collagen derived from the body wall of sea cucumbers (Stichopus hermanni) exhibited greater enthalpy values (0.28±0.01 and 0.62±0.07 J/g, respectively), indicating enhanced stability of collagen molecules (Shaik et al., 2024b). A higher enthalpy value of collagen suggests that more thermal energy is needed to break its intramolecular bonds.
Collagen, like any other protein, is frequently defined in terms of its denaturation temperature (Td) or maximum transition temperature (Tm) (Zhong et al., 2015), as summarized in Table 5. For example, the thermal stability of collagen hydrolysate from sheep hides decreased gradually from 153.3°C (0 min) to 137.91°C after 4 h of hydrolysis (León-López et al., 2019b). Furthermore, the data indicates that intermolecular helix formation decreases dramatically with progress in hydrolysis. This decrease began at the bimolecular nucleation step, where glycine and proline residues assisted an intramolecular β-turn (Choi et al., 2018).
Solubility measures the dissolution of a sample in a solvent. The solubility of collagen is evaluated by dissolving collagen in acid solutions of varying pH or salt (NaCl) solutions of different concentrations (Gaurav et al., 2017). Collagen solubility is the most significant component and a great indicator of their functioning. Understanding collagen solubility provides essential information on protein consumption and functionality, particularly in foams, emulsions, and gels (Li et al., 2018). Collagen from different sources may have varying molecular properties, which contribute to a wide range of collagen solubility characteristics. In case the pH is above or below the isoelectric point (pI) value, the protein molecule’s net positive or negative charge rises, and the solubility is enhanced by the repulsive force between chains (Li et al., 2020). In other words, when the pH value deviates from the pI value, the solubility of collagen increases. Collagen solubility is proportional to pH and pI values. Table 5 summarizes data on the solubility of collagen.
The antimicrobial properties of hydrolyzed collagen are the activities against some of the most dangerous antibiotic-resistant bacteria by destroying target cells quickly (Aleman and Martinez-Alvarez, 2013). Bioactive peptides with antimicrobial activities have potential uses in natural product food safety and protection. The content of amino acids first shape the molecule’s configuration, establishing hydrophobic and hydrophilic areas, domains, and charges. Recently, antimicrobial hydrolysates from tuna and squid skins were produced using Bifidobacterium animalis subsp., Lactis and Lactobacillus acidophilus. These collagen hydrolysates (of 1–10 kDa and <1 kDa) were highly effective at a concentration of 0.2 mg/mL against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including Shewanella putrefaciens and Photobacterium phosphoreum (Gomez-Guillen et al., 2011). Tuna hydrolysate fractions demonstrated greater activity than squid fractions against Lactobacillus acidophilus (at 0.2 mg/mL) as well as Salmonella choleraesuis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (at 2 mg/mL). However, squid fractions were more effective against Aeromona hydrophila at a concentration of 2 mg/mL. Collagens exhibited greater antibacterial efficacy compared to their hydrolysates, requiring lower concentrations for effective inhibition. Hydrolyzed collagens from lamb and sheep showed significant antimicrobial activity against both Gram-positive bacteria (Listeria monocytogenes, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis) and Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli, Salmonella choleraesuis, Enterobacter cloacae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) (Vidal et al., 2022). The lowest molecular weight fractions, particularly in squid samples, had the most potent antibacterial activity. Peptides derived from fish gelatine contain repeating motifs of Gly-Pro-Ala triplets in their structure (Senadheera et al., 2020). Their hydrophobic nature allows peptides to pass through membranes, while their positive charge facilitates interaction with the negatively charged bacterial surface, resulting in pore formation (Aleman and Martinez-Alvarez, 2013).
Antioxidants are the chemicals that help the body combat free radicals. Oxidation is critical for aerobic species, such as vertebrates and humans. However, the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the human body can have damaging and deadly cellular consequences by oxidizing lipids, proteins, enzymes, and DNA (Banerjee et al., 2015). ROS production is linked to heart disease, stroke, diabetes, arteriosclerosis, cancer, and neurological and inflammatory illnesses (Lee et al., 2011). Antioxidants help to mitigate these issues and can extend life expectancy. Hydrolysate peptides with antioxidant bioactivity safeguard the human body by neutralizing ROS, commonly referred to as free radicals, which cause oxidative damage at cellular level (Tawalbeh et al., 2025). The antioxidant properties of peptides are studied extensively for their ability to prevent lipid peroxidation in dietary proteins (Banerjee et al., 2015).
Some research on collagen peptides or hydrolysates has exhibited antioxidant properties, but fewer experiments on poultry and mammalian sources are found. Antioxidant properties are found in peptides derived from the enzymatic hydrolysis of fish processing wastes (Sila and Bougatef, 2016). Collagen hydrolysates (17%) from the skins of snakehead murrels (Channa striata) showed substantial antioxidant activity, compared to butylated hydroxytoluene, vitamin C, and vitamin E (Sinaga et al., 2020). Collagen peptides from abalone foot muscles with 49.18% and 83.83% yield showed antioxidant properties in both in vitro and in vivo studies (Zhou et al., 2012). Similarly, salmon skin collagen hydrolysate, processed using free or immobilized extracellular protease from Vibrio sp. SQS2-3, exhibited enhanced antioxidant activity, particularly in peptides smaller than 3 kDa (Wu et al., 2018). A bioactive peptide derived from cow tendon collagen protects cells against oxidative stress (Banerjee et al., 2015). Royal jelly-derived collagen peptide also possesses anti-aging properties and protects against oxidative stress (Qiu et al., 2020). Moreover, two collagen hydrolysates derived from lamb and sheep demonstrated antioxidant activity through the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay, achieving 13.4% activity at a concentration of 0.0002% and 13.1% activity at a concentration of 0.0005% (Vidal et al., 2022). In another study, three glycosylated bone collagen hydrolysates derived from chicken, porcine, and bovine sources demonstrated significant antioxidant properties, as evidenced by DPPH, ABTS•+ radical cation (2,2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid), and hydroxyl radical scavenging activities as well as ferrous ion reducing power (Qi et al., 2024). The hydroxyl radical scavenging activity showed a concentration-dependent increase, ranging from 0.25 mg/mL to 4.00 mg/mL. Collagen peptides are potent antioxidants that should be further investigated.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce blood pressure by relaxing the veins and arteries (Chen et al., 2020). These inhibitors prevent the release of angiotensin II, a chemical that narrows blood arteries, leading to high blood pressure. Angiotensin II also stimulates the production of hormones that raise blood pressure. ACE inhibitors are used to prevent and treat high blood pressure (hypertension), coronary artery disease, heart failure, heart attack, diabetes, certain chronic kidney diseases, scleroderma (hardening of the skin and connective tissues), and migraine (Chen et al., 2020). ACE inhibitory activity is found in the collagen peptides of the skin of milkfish (Chanos chanos) (Baehaki et al., 2016). Pig femoral bone peptides also exhibit antihypertensive and ACE-inhibitory properties (Liu et al., 2011).
Anti-aging peptides, whether natural or synthetic, have emerged as revolutionary products (Jhawar et al., 2020). Collagen peptides, a key component in food supplements and cosmetics, have the potential to address skin issues, as suggested by researchers (Li et al., 2022). Most of the research in this field has been directed toward the prevention and treatment of skin aging (Bolke et al., 2019), instilling hope for the future of skincare.
Collagen peptides from various sources have distinct effects on the skin. For example, they can reduce the activity of collagenase enzymes (matrix metalloproteinases: MMP-3 and MMP-13, and gelatinase enzymes: MMP-2 and MMP-9), thereby regulating skin hydration, reducing loss of skin moisture, minimizing wrinkling, improving skin elasticity, and repairing collagen degradation and elastic fiber damage caused by ultraviolet (UV) radiation (Pyun et al., 2012). This was proved by Kang et al. (2018) in a study where hairless mice exposed to UV radiation were administered 1,000 mg/kg collagen peptide for 9 weeks. In addition, collagen peptides regulate the expression of hyaluronic acid synthase mRNA and the skin moisturizing factor filaggrin, increase hyaluronic acid levels in skin tissue, and decrease the expression of hyaluronidase (HYAL-1 and HYAL-2) mRNA. In other words, collagen peptide may help to prevent loss of skin moisture caused by UV exposure (UV-B). In a recent study, an orally disintegrating collagen film derived from tilapia fish scales was shown to reduce skin wrinkle depth while significantly enhancing skin elasticity and density, highlighting its potential as an effective anti-aging agent (Lee et al., 2022).
Antifreeze is a situation that prevents the formation of crystals while maintaining a delicate texture. Specific collagen peptides inhibit ice crystal development. In industry, antifreeze activity is a common problem (Chen et al., 2017). The structure, texture, and quality of frozen meals can be preserved using an antifreeze ingredient. For example, in sucrose model situations, chicken collagen peptides hinder ice crystal formation (Du and Betti, 2016).
The enzymatic supramolecular assembly significantly enhanced the antifreeze activity of tilapia skin-collagen peptides, highlighting their potential for development as novel antifreeze additives in the food industry (Ouyang et al., 2024). Similarly, antifreeze peptides derived from squid skin collagen demonstrated superior cryoprotective activity, showing potential as innovative antifreeze agents. These peptides also exhibited an inhibitory effect on the denaturation and structural changes of myofibrillar proteins during freeze-thaw cycles and partially retained their water-binding capacity (Cao et al., 2023b). Additionally, hydrolysates obtained from salmon skin collagen displayed notable anti-freezing activity, particularly in peptide fractions >3 kDa (Wu et al., 2018).
Besides its potential utility in food preservation, collagen peptides with antifreeze and cryoprotection activity also protect cells and tissues from freezing (Nguyen et al., 2018). They interact with cell membrane phospholipids during freeze-drying, providing antifreeze effects, such as those observed in pig skin collagen peptides on freeze-dried Streptococcus thermophiles (Wang et al., 2016). Lactobacillus bulgaricus is protected from hypothermia by a shark skin collagen hydrolysates peptide. Alternative antifreeze proteins may be found in collagen hydrolysates, with antifreeze proteins (AFP) and antifreeze glycoproteins (AFGP) being the most studied components (Chen et al., 2020).
In addition, these proteins by attaching to microscopic ice crystals not only inhibit ice nucleation but also reduce ice crystal development and alter ice crystal habits. The ice-binding face of these antifreeze proteins is flat, with the distance between oxygen atoms nearly matching the distance in ice nuclei that of about 4.52 Å (Kumar et al., 2015).
Collagen hydrolysates have the potential to attach calcium ions, increasing their bioavailability. As a result, collagen hydrolysates are used in functional food components to treat mineral shortages (Pal and Suresh, 2016). Hydrolyzed collagen works as an anticoagulant and helps to reduce the damage caused by low temperatures in cells and tissues. Furthermore, the versatility of marine collagen has broadened its utilization across the food industry because of its stabilizing properties. Specifically, it finds applications as a biodegradable film-forming material, colloid stabilizer, foaming agent, and a microencapsulating agent (Farooq et al., 2024). However, it might benefit foods stored at cold or freezing temperatures (Cao et al., 2016). Collagen hydrolysates are utilized for selecting products, such as meats, drinks, soups, and much more, as summarized in Table 6. It helps to improve and maintain their sensory and physico-chemical properties.
Table 6. Application of hydrolysed collagen in multiple industries
| Industry | Product | Sources | Hydrolyzed collagen | Application | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food industry | Tilapia muscle (preserved) | Nile tilapia | 1.1% | Antimicrobial and maintenance of freshness (pH and hardness) | Song et al.,2022 |
| Butter and chocolate sauce | Pacu skin and Tilapia bones | 1% | Collagen is able to retain the emulsion properties of butter and chocolate sauce for 25 weeks and does not show any cytotoxic effect on leukocytes and Vero cells. (EAI [R = 0.832], ESI [R=0.842]). | Dey et al., 2021 | |
| Probiotic fermented Milk | Not defined by the author | 3% | Collagen protein hydrolysate acts as additive and favorably stimulated the survival of bifidobacterium Bb-12 during 21 days of storage. | Znamirowska et al., 2020 | |
| CSC-film | Wastes from leather industry | 15% | The packaging material is used in very hot and humid environments without any deterioration of physical properties. | Maliha et al., 2024 | |
| Meat balls | Fish | 3% | Greatly inhibited the lipid oxidation and improved the antioxidant activity of product (thiobarbituric acid [TBA] value 0.78±0.24 mg MDA/kg). | Palamutoğlu and Kasnak, 2019 | |
| Chicken patties | Not defined by the author | 20% | Improves the quality characteristics of reduced-fat chicken patties. | Kim et al., 2018b | |
| HC in sausages to replace pork backfat | Germina® | 11.25% | Sausages with greater water-holding capacity (80.49±0.54%) and improved texture in terms of hardness (0.694±0.090), cohesiveness (0.459±0.032), gumminess (0.304±0.025), and chewiness (0.248±0.065). | Sousa et al., 2017 | |
| Fish HC in buffalo patties | Az-Zahrah Sdn.Bhd® | 10% | Products with higher protein content (26.68±0.86%), lower fat content (3.11±0.09%). | Ibrahim et al., 2020 | |
| Dairy beverage with HC, açaí pulp, and cheese | Tovani Benzaquen ingredients® | 1% | High sensory acceptability, and good physicochemical and microbiological parameters. | Mata-Rigoto et al., 2019 | |
| Chrysanthemum beverage | Pigskin | 0.1% | Excellent clarification effect and better sensory quality and storage stability. | Zhang et al., 2018 | |
| Cosmetics and Nutri-cosmetics | Oral supplementation with vitamins A, C, and E and zinc | Not defined by the author | 90% | Improved the hydration, texture, elasticity, and firmness of the skin in women aged between 40 and 50 years after 28 days of treatment. | Maia et al., 2019 |
| Beverage | Nitta Gelatin Inc® | 15% | Changes in periorbital wrinkles, facial skin hydration, and skin elasticity in healthy women aged 30–60 years. | Koizumi et al., 2018 | |
| Drinking ampoules with acerola fruit extract, vitamins C and E, zinc, and biotin | ELASTEN® | 10% | 12 weeks of oral supplementation improved skin properties, such a hydration (35.0±4.8 AU), elasticity (R2=0.69±0.05), roughness (161.6±11.4 µm), and density (35.7±7.2 µm). | Bolke et al., 2019 | |
| Fish | Milkfish scales | Not provided | Excellent water-holding capacity, moisture absorption, retention and anti-skin aging, and anti-melanogenic capacities. | Chen et al., 2018 | |
| Fish | Pure Gold Collagen® | 10% | Reduction of dryness of the skin, wrinkles, and nasolabial depth, as well as increase in skin firmness and collagen density. | Borumand andSibilla,2014 | |
| HC peptide | CollaSel Pro® | >90% | Effectively improves dermal health and the appearance of sagging and ameliorates the signs of the aging process. | Demir-Dora et al., 2024 | |
| Bio-material | HC-chitosan hydrogels | Tilapia fish | 2% | Antibacterial activity against E. coliand Staphylococcus aureus | Ouyang et al., 2018 |
| Nanofibrous scaffold functionalized with HC | Tilapia fish | 1.88% | Antimicrobial property against E. coliand Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Ramadass et al., 2019 | |
| Collagen–HC films | Wastes from leather industry | 8% | Excellent barrier properties against UV light. | Ocak, 2018 | |
| Chitosan-fucoidan cryogels | Jellyfish | 3% | It is biocompatible and its porous nature supports cell infiltration and repair processes in wound-healing process with non-cytotoxic nature. | Carvalho et al., 2020 | |
| Collagen cream | Snakehead fish | 3% | Promoting faster wound recovery by improving skin elasticity and reduces the size and severity of burn wounds. | Hasri et al., 2020 | |
| HC film | Skin waste of squid | 0.5% | Improves dermal wound-healing process with promising biocompatibility and better biodegradability. | Veeruraj et al., 2019 |
Note: *HC = hydrolyzed collagen; MDA: malondialdehyde.
In processed food, collagen hydrolysates are utilized to substitute pork fat in sausages at a 50% substitution level, resulting in higher water-holding capacity, better after-cooking stability, and enhanced texture (chewiness and hardness) (Sousa et al., 2017). In buffalo patties, fish-hydrolyzed collagen increased protein content, reduced fat content, and maintained sensory acceptance and superior texture, compared to patties without hydrolyzed collagen (Ibrahim et al., 2020). Bovine skin collagen hydrolysates combined with modified starch and guar gum in ham production resulted in lower syneresis with a final concentration of 2.0% collagen hydrolysates (Prestes, 2015). Adding hydrolyzed collagen from fish to beverages, such as orange juice (2.5%), enhanced nutritional and functional qualities, including higher protein content, bioavailability, low viscosity, and high-water solubility (Bilek and Bayram, 2015). Hydrolyzed collagen may also be added to soup, affecting viscosity and functional characteristics. It has strong radical scavenging abilities for ABTS•+ radical cation and DPPH (Benjakul et al., 2012). When added to chrysanthemum beverages, pig skin-hydrolyzed collagen improved clarity, sensory quality, and storage stability in a smaller quantity than other commercial clarifiers. Hydrolyzed collagen is also employed in developing physicochemical and functional qualities in various food items without affecting sensory characteristics, making it a promising functional substance.
Skin aging is a continuous biological process characterized by a progressive decline in its physiological functions, including collagen and elastin production, thermoregulation, hydration, and sebum production (Al-Atif, 2022). Collagen is critical in cosmetic formulations due to hydrating, rejuvenating, and film-forming characteristics. It binds water considerably, maintaining adequate skin hydration throughout the day, which softens and moisturizes the skin (Jridi et al., 2015). Collagen’s film-forming ability reduces transepidermal water loss in addition to being a natural humectant. Peptide occlusion prevents mechanical deficiencies from causing harm to the skin and hair. Furthermore, occlusion improves appearance of the skin by making it more radiant, lighted, and smooth (Sionkowska et al., 2020). Collagen is utilized in various oral and topical cosmetic products, such as creams, gels, serums, and masks (Jadach et al., 2024).
Types I, III, and V collagen predominantly make up skin tissues. Marine collagen is rich in type I collagen, as it is the most prevalent component of the skin (Sionkowska et al., 2020). Furthermore, anti-aging, anti-wrinkle, UV radiation defense, and wound-healing capabilities are found in marine collagen, which has led to incorporation of collagen in cosmetic formulations (Avila et al., 2018). As a result, various cosmetic products, such as the Etude House Moist-Full Collagen Cream, 3W Clinic Collagen Eye Cream, and Bio-Essence Collagen Essence Cream, were available on the market, with collagen in their compositions (Loh et al., 2021). In addition, collagen cosmetic masks are found to decrease effectively wrinkles and expression lines in the neck, face, and neckline. The cosmetics industry has done various tests on using collagen in cosmetics, and the results are patented by Sionkowska et al. (2020). Therefore, more information on using collagen in cosmetics is needed in the public domain.
Nutricosmetics, or oral collagen supplementation, are oral-based natural health products containing targeted nutrients and mixed antioxidant elixirs that have a prophylactic or therapeutical impact on the skin, hair, and nails. Nutricosmetics are evolved from the nutraceutical and cosmeceutical sectors (Faria-Silva et al., 2020). Nutricosmetics have gained popularity as anti-aging products, with hydrolyzed collagen oral supplements improving skin hydration, wrinkle reduction, elasticity, firmness, and skin rejuvenation by reaching to deeper layers of the skin (Table 6) (Usman and Bharadvaja, 2023).
Human skin consists of the epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous tissue. Collagen and elastin in the dermis keep the skin’s structure and suppleness (Ganceviciene et al., 2012). Type I collagen, making up to 80% of dermal collagen, is crucial for skin strength (Abedin et al., 2014). Collagen production decreases with age, resulting in worsening of dermis structure (Ganceviciene et al., 2012). Collagen is commonly included in skin’s anti-aging treatments for its inherent moisturizing, softening, and luminous properties (Alves et al., 2017). Hydrolyzed collagen is preferred in cosmetics due to its higher solubility at neutral pH, ease of dermis penetration, and water-binding characteristics (Valenzuela-Rojo et al., 2018).
In vivo studies using hydrolyzed collagen oral supplementation in women aged 40–60 years resulted in a substantial increase in skin hydration, wrinkling, and agility after 12 weeks (Kim et al., 2018a). Women aged 35–65 years experienced improved dermal thickness, firmness, and elasticity after 3 months of hydrolyzed collagen supplementation (Addor et al., 2018). In another research with 120 patients, regular oral supplementation of fish-hydrolyzed collagen improved skin texture and elasticity over 90 days. In addition, there was evidence of a preventive impact on joint health (Czajka et al., 2018). Nutricosmetics resulted in a substantial increase in skin hydration and collagen density at the dermis level in women aged 40–59 years. However, after 4 weeks of supplementation, the dermal collagen network fragmentation was dramatically reduced, and these benefits lasted for another 12 weeks (Asserin et al., 2015).
Collagen is highly considered for its biocompatibility and biodegradability, making it a safe and effective biomaterial. Recently, its use in tissue engineering and therapeutic applications has gained attraction for these properties (Ramadass et al., 2014). Hydrolyzed collagen offers significant benefits over native collagen in terms of solubility and ease of extraction, as it does not require a complex multistep extraction process. However, due to the low molecular weight of peptides, hydrolyzed collagen cannot form scaffolds on its own, and is often combined with other biopolymers, such as cellulose and chitosan, to overcome this limitation (Ficai et al., 2013).
Films made from a cellulose–hydrolyzed collagen mix exhibit vital transparency, excellent UV radiation absorption, and strong cell adhesion and proliferation support. High biocompatibility of these films suggests their potential utility as biomaterials, as shown in Table 6 (Pei et al., 2013). Additionally, collagen–hydrolyzed collagen films from leather waste have demonstrated high transparency and effective UV light barrier qualities. Experiments using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) revealed 100% miscibility between the two polymers (Ocak, 2018).
Furthermore, due to low molecular weight and amino acid content, hydrolyzed collagen is advantageous for treating bone and joint issues, as it enhances bioavailability and promotes collagen production, thereby improving osteointegration (Ficai et al., 2013). Chitosan sponges are an alternative biomaterial with hydrolyzed collagen. They are made using a sol-gel transition approach, and hydrolyzed collagen includes porous shape, better biostability, superior water absorption capacity, excellent biocompatibility, and antibacterial activity (Ramadass et al., 2014).
Hydrolyzed collagen has been employed in producing hydrogels for administering pharmaceuticals, such as insulin and methylene blue, as it reduces water absorption. Drug release from these hydrogels is faster at pH 2, making it suitable for medications susceptible to degradation in acidic gastric fluids (Noppakundilograt et al., 2018). Hydrogels made with chitosan and fish-hydrolyzed collagen have demonstrated antibacterial efficacy against E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus and promote cell proliferation, migration, and wound healing (Ouyang et al., 2018). Electrospinning can functionalize nanofibrous scaffolds with hydrolyzed collagen, providing a porous structure, good mechanical strength, biocompatibility, and antibacterial activity against E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Ramadass et al., 2019).
In conclusion, acid, alkali, and enzyme extraction methods are the standard approaches for collagen extraction with these methods being the most efficient and preferred. Advanced collagen extraction technologies, such as DES, SFE, and MAE, offer advantages such as improved yield, reduced protein denaturation, effective preservation of bioactivity, and enhanced environmental sustainability. However, these methods also face challenges, such as high initial equipment expenses, operational complexity, and the need for further optimization to ensure product stability across various biological sources. Hydrolyzed collagen provides significant functional properties due to its bioactivities, such as antifreeze, anticancer, antioxidant, and antihypertensive properties. In addition, hydrolyzed collagen has good biological effects in cosmetic applications, such as increasing cell proliferation, water-holding capacity, moisture absorption and retention, and anti-aging effects on the skin. In the food sector, collagen hydrolysate is widely used as a functional component, promoting water retention in meat products, enhancing sensory properties, and improving the chemical and physical qualities of beverages and dairy products. Furthermore, hydrolyzed collagen combined with cellulose or chitosan for creating scaffolds in the biomedical industry has aided collagen formation, bone and joint disease management, wound therapy, high biocompatibility, and antibacterial qualities. Thus, hydrolyzed collagen possesses a vast potential for applications in various industries.
Data are made available on request.
The authors sincerely appreciated the laboratory resources and technical assistance provided by Universiti Malaysia Terengganu.
Norizah Mhd. Sarbon: supervision, conceptualization, methodology, validation, and writing (review and editing). Assyarafanee Hiefnee and Mannur Ismail Shaik: methodology, writing (original draft, review, and editing), investigation, and visualization. Noraizah Mhd. Sarbon and Ismail Fitry Mohammad Rashedi: Review and editing, investigation, and visualization. Anis Syafiqah Yusri: validation, review, and editing.
The authors declared no conflict of interest or any competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
There was no financial support from any organization or individual support for this study. No specific grant was given to this research by any funding organization in the public, private, or nonprofit sector.
Abedin, M.Z., Karim, A.A., Latiff, A.A., Gan, C.Y., Ghazali, F.C., Barzideh, Z., Ferdosh, S., Akanda, M.J., Zzaman, W., Karim, M.R., and Sarker, M.Z., 2014. Biochemical and radical-scavenging properties of sea cucumber (Stichopus vastus) collagen hydrolysates. Natural Product Research 28: 1302–1305. 10.1080/14786419.2014.900617
Abuine, R., Rathnayake, A.U., and Byun, H.G., 2019. Biological activity of peptides purified from fish skin hydrolysates. Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 22(10): 1–14. 10.1186/s41240-019-0125-4
Addor, F.A.S., Cotta Vieira, J., and Abreu Melo, C.S., 2018. Improvement of dermal parameters in aged skin after oral use of a nutrient supplement. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology 11: 195–201. 10.2147/CCID.S150269
Ahmed, R., Haq, M., and Chun, B.S., 2019. Characterization of marine derived collagen extracted from the by-products of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus). International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 135: 668–676. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.213
Ahn, M.Y., Hwang, J.S., Ham, S.A., Hur, J., Jo, Y., Lee, S., Choi, M.-J., Han, S.G., and Seo, H.G., 2017. Subcritical water-hydrolyzed fish collagen ameliorates survival of endotoxemic mice by inhibiting HMGB1 release in a HO-1-dependent manner. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy 93: 923–930. 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.07.041
Akbarian, M., Khani, A., Eghbalpour, S., and Uversky, V.N., 2022. Bioactive peptides: synthesis, sources, applications, and proposed mechanisms of action. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23(3): 1445. 10.3390/ijms23031445
Akram, A.N., and Zhang, C., 2020. Extraction of collagen-II with pepsin and ultrasound treatment from chicken sternal cartilage, physicochemical and functional properties. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 64: 1–13. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105053
Al-Atif, H., 2022. Collagen supplements for aging and wrinkles: a paradigm shift in the fields of dermatology and cosmetics. Dermatology Practical and Conceptual 12(1): e2022018. 10.5826/dpc.1201a18
Aleman, A., and Martinez-Alvarez, O., 2013. Marine collagen as a source of bioactive molecules: a review. Journal of Natural Products 3: 105–114. 10.2174/2210315511303020005
Ali, A.M.M., Kishimura, H., and Benjakul, S., 2018. Extraction efficiency and characteristics of acid and pepsin soluble collagens from the skin of golden carp (Probarbus jullieni) as affected by ultrasonication. Process Biochemistry 66: 237–244. 10.1016/j.procbio.2018.01.003
Almeida, P.F., Araujo, M.G.O., and Santana, J.C.C., 2012. Collagen extraction from chicken feet for jelly production. Acta Scientiarum Technology 34(3): 345–351. 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i3.10602
Alves, A., Marques, A., Martins, E., Silva, T., and Reis, R., 2017. Cosmetic potential of marine fish skin collagen. Cosmetics 4(39): 1–16. 10.3390/cosmetics4040039
Amirrah, I.N., Lokanathan, Y., Zulkiflee, I., Wee, M.F.M.R., Motta, A., and Fauzi, M.B., 2022. A comprehensive review on collagen type i development of biomaterials for tissue engineering: from biosynthesis to bioscaffold. Biomedicines 10(9): 2307. 10.3390/biomedicines10092307
Amyoony, J., Gorman, M., Dabas, T., Moss, R., and McSweeney, M.B. 2023. Consumer perception of collagen from different sources: an investigation using hedonic scale and check all that apply. Journal of Food Sciences 88: 5236–5247. 10.1111/1750-3841.16822
Asserin, J., Lati, E., Shioya, T., and Prawitt, J., 2015. The effect of oral collagen peptide supplementation on skin moisture and the dermal collagen network: evidence from an ex vivo model and randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 14: 291–301. 10.1111/jocd.12174
Avila, M.I.R., Rodríguez Barroso, L.G., and Sánchez, M.L., 2018. Collagen: a review on its sources and potential cosmetic applications. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 17(1): 20–26. 10.1111/jocd.12450
Baderi, N.A., and Sarbon, N.M., 2019. Microstructure, extractability and physicochemical properties of shortfin scad (Decapterus macrosoma) bone collagen as influenced by acetic acid concentration. International Food Research Journal 26(2): 451–458.
Baehaki, A., Suhartono, M.T., Sukarno, Syah, D., and Setyaihadi. S., 2016. Collagen peptides from fish skin with angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and cancer antiproliferative activity. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences 7: 1994–2000.
Bai, C., Wei, Q., and Ren, X., 2017. Selective extraction of collagen peptides with high purity from cod skins by deep eutectic solvents. ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering 5(8): 7220–7227. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01439
Banerjee, P., Suguna, L., and Shanthi, C., 2015. Wound healing activity of a collagen-derived cryptic peptide. Amino Acids 47: 317–328. 10.1007/s00726-014-1860-
Barzkar, N., Sukhikh, S., Babich, O., Venmathi Maran, B.A., and Tamadoni Jahromi, S., 2023. Marine collagen: purification, properties and application. Frontiers in Marine Science 10: 1245077. 10.3389/fmars.2023.1245077
Batista, M.P., Fernández, N., Gaspar, F.B., Bronze, M.D.R., and Duarte, A.R.C., 2022. Extraction of biocompatible collagen from blue shark skins through the conventional extraction process intensification using natural deep eutectic solvents. Frontiers in Chemistry 10: 937036. 10.3389/fchem.2022.937036
Benjakul, S., Nalinanon, S., and Shahidi, F., 2012. Fish collagen. In: Benjamin, K.S. (Eds.), Food Biochemistry and Food Processing, pp. 365–387. Wiley-Blackwell, Ames, Iowa. 10.1002/9781118308035.ch20
Bhuimbar, M.V., Bhagwat, P.K., and Dandge, P.B., 2019. Extraction and characterization of acid soluble collagen from fish waste: development of collagen-chitosan blend as food packaging film. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 7: 1–7. 10.1016/j.jece.2019.102983
Bilek, S.E., and Bayram, S.K., 2015. Fruit juice drink production containing hydrolyzed collagen. Journal of Functional Foods 14: 562–569. 10.1016/J.JFF.2015.02.024
Bolke, L., Schlippe, G., Ger, J., and Voss, W., 2019. A collagen supplement improves skin hydration, elasticity, roughness, and density: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, blind study. Nutrients 11: 1–14. 10.3390/nu11102494
Borumand, M., and Sibilla, S., 2014. Daily consumption of the collagen supplement Pure Gold Collagen® reduces visible signs of aging. Clinical Interventions in Aging 9: 1747–1758. 10.2147/CIA.S65939
Cao, S., Cai, J., Wang, X., Zhou, K., Liu, L., He, L., Qi, X., and Yang, H., 2023b. Cryoprotective effect of collagen hydrolysates from squid skin on frozen shrimp and characterizations of its antifreeze peptides. Food Science and Technology (LWT) 174: 114443. 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.114443
Cao, J., Duan, Q., Liu, X., Shen, X., and Li, C., 2019. Extraction and physicochemical characterization of pepsin soluble collagens from golden pompano (Trachinotus blochii) skin and bone. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology 28(8): 837–847. 10.1080/10498850.2019.1652216
Cao, C., Wang, H., Zhang, J., Kan, H., Liu, Y., Guo, L., Tong, H., Wu, Y., and Ge, C., 2023a. Effects of extraction methods on the characteristics, physicochemical properties and sensory quality of collagen from spent-hens bones. Foods 12(1): 202. 10.3390/foods12010202
Cao, H., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Y.B., Xu, F., Yu, J.S., and Yuan, M., 2016. Antifreeze and cryoprotective activities of ice-binding collagen peptides from pig skin. Food Chemistry 194: 1245–1253. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.08.102
Cao, J., Duan, Q., Liu, X., Shen, X., and Li, C., 2019. Extraction and physicochemical characterization of pepsin soluble collagens from golden pompano (Trachinotus blochii) skin and bone. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology 28(8): 837–847. 10.1080/10498850.2019.1652216
Carvalho, D.N., López-Cebral, R., Sousa, R.O., Alves, A.L., Reys, L.L., Silva, S.S., Oliveira, J.M., Reis, R.L., and Silva, T.H., 2020. Marine collagen-chitosan-fucoidan cryogels as cell-laden biocomposites envisaging tissue engineering. Biomedical Materials 15: 55030. 10.1088/1748-605X/ab9f04
Chen, Y., Jin, H., Yang, F., Jin, S., Liu, C., Zhang, L., Huang, J., Wang, S., Yan, Z., Cai, X., Zhao, R., Yu, F., Yang, Z., Ding, G., and Tang, Y., 2019. Physicochemical, antioxidant properties of giant croaker (Nibea japonica) swim bladders collagen and wound healing evaluation. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 138: 483–491. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.111
Chen, M., Li, Y., and Huang, G., 2020. Potential health functions of collagen bioactive peptides: a review. American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology 16: 507–519. 10.3844/ajbbsp.2020.507.519
Chen, J., Wang, G., and Li, Y., 2021. Preparation and characterization of thermally stable collagens from the scales of lizardfish (Synodus macrops). Marine Drugs 19(11): 597. 10.3390/md19110597
Chen, X., Wu, J., Li, L., and Wang, S., 2017. The cryoprotective effects of antifreeze peptides from pigskin collagen on texture properties and water mobility of frozen dough subjected to freeze-thaw cycles. European Food Research and Technology 243: 1149–1156. 10.1007/s00217-016-2830-x
Chen, Y.P., Wu, H.T., Wang, G.H., and Liang, C.H., 2018. Improvement of skin condition on skin moisture and anti-melanogenesis by collagen peptides from milkfish (Chanos chanos) scales. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 382. p. 22067. IOP Publishing Ltd, Bristol, UK.
Cheng, X., Shao, Z., Li, C., Yu, L., Raja, M.A., and Liu, C., 2017. Isolation, characterization and evaluation of collagen from jellyfish Rhopilema esculentum Kishinouye for use in hemostatic applications. PLoS ONE. 12: 1–21. 10.1371/journal.pone.0169731
Choi, D., Min, S.G., and Jo, Y.J., 2018. Functionality of porcine skin hydrolysates produced by hydrothermal processing for liposomal delivery system. Journal of Food Biochemistry 42: 1–11. 10.1111/jfbc.12464
Coelho, R.C.G., Marques, A.L.P., Oliveira, S.M., Diogo, G.S., Pirraco, R.P., Moreira-Silva, J., Xavier, J.C., Reis, R.L., Silva, T.H., and Mano, J.F., 2017. Extraction and characterization of collagen from Antarctic and Sub-Antarctic squid and its potential application in hybrid scaffolds for tissue engineering. Materials Science and Engineering: C 78: 787–795. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.122
Czajka, A., Kania, E.M., Genovese, L., Corbo, A., Merone, G., Luci, C., and Sibilla, S., 2018. Daily oral supplementation with collagen peptides combined with vitamins and other bioactive compounds improves skin elasticity and has a beneficial effect on joint and general wellbeing. Nutrition Research 57: 97–108. 10.1016/j.nutres.2018.06.001
Dave, D., Liu, Y., Clark, L., Dave, N., Trenholm, S., and Westcott, J., 2019. Availability of marine collagen from Newfoundland fisheries and aquaculture waste resources. Bioresource Technology Reports 7: 1–8. 10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100271
Dave, D., and Routray, W., 2018. Current scenario of Canadian fishery and corresponding underutilized species and fishery byproducts: a potential source of omega-3 fatty acids. Journal of Cleaner Production 180: 617–641. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.091
Demir-Dora, D., Ozsoy, U., Yildirim, Y., Yilmaz, O., Aytac, P., Yilmaz, B., Dogan Kurtoglu, E., Akman, A., Tezman, S., Inaloz, H.S., and Erenmemisoglu, A., 2024. The efficacy and safety of CollaSel Pro® hydrolyzed collagen peptide supplementation without addons in improving skin health in adult females: a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study using biophysical and skin imaging techniques. Journal of Clinical Medicine 13: 5370. 10.3390/jcm13185370
Devita, L., Nurilmala, M., Lioe, H.N., and Suhartono, M.T., 2021. Chemical and antioxidant characteristics of skin-derived collagen obtained by acid-enzymatic hydrolysis of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus). Marine Drugs 19(222): 1–19. 10.3390/md19040222
Dey, P., Kadharbasha, S., Bajaj, M., Das, J., Chakraborty, T., Bhat, C., and Banerjee, P., 2021. Contribution of Quasifibrillar properties of collagen hydrolysates towards lowering of Interface tension in emulsion-based food leading to shelf-life enhancement. Food and Bioprocess Technology 14: 1566–1586. 10.1007/s11947-021-02640-z
Dhakal, D., Koomsap, P., Lamichhane, A., Sadiq, M.B., and Anil, A.K., 2018. Optimization of collagen extraction from chicken feet by papain hydrolysis and synthesis of chicken feet collagen based biopolymeric fibres. Food Bioscience 23: 23–30. 10.1016/j.fbio.2018.03.003
Du, L., and Betti, M., 2016. Identification and evaluation of cryoprotective peptides from chicken collagen: ice-growth inhibition activity compared to that of type I antifreeze proteins in sucrose model systems. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 64: 5232–5240. 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b01911
Faria-Silva, C., Ascenso, A., Costa, A.M., Marto, J., Carvalheiro, M., Margarida Ribeiro, H., and Simões, S., 2020. Feeding the skin: a new trend in food and cosmetics convergence. Trends in Food Science and Technology 95: 21–32.
Farooq, S., Ahmad, M.I., Zheng, S., Ali, U., Li, Y., Shixiu, C., and Zhang, H., 2024. A review on marine collagen: sources, extraction methods, colloids properties, and food applications. Collagen Leather 6: 11. 10.1186/s42825-024-00152-y
Fauziyah, B., Fatimatussholichah, D., and Syarifah, A.R., 2023. Comparison of microwave and oven extraction methods on the quality of pork, beef and duck gelatine. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry 66(4): 189–195. 10.21608/ejchem.2022.143115.6248
Feng, X., Liu, T., Ma, L., Dai, H., Fu, Y., Yu, Y., Zhu, H., Wang, H., Tan, H., and Zhang, Y., 2022. A green extraction method for gelatin and its molecular mechanism. Food Hydrocolloids 124: 107344. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107344
Ferrario, C., Rusconi, F., Pulaj, A., Macchi, R., Landini, P., Paroni, M., Colombo, G., Martinello, T., Melotti, L., Gomiero, C., Candia Carnevali, M.D., Bonasoro, F., Patruno, M., and Sugni, M., 2020. From food waste to innovative biomaterial: sea urchin-derived collagen for applications in skin regenerative medicine. Marine Drugs 18: 1–18. 10.3390/md18080414
Ficai, A., Albu, M.G., Birsan, M., Sonmez, M., Ficai, D., Trandafir, V., and Andronescu, E., 2013. Collagen hydrolysate-based collagen/hydroxyapatite composite materials. Journal of Molecular Structure 1037: 704–711. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2012.12.052
Fidler, A.L., Boudko, S.P., Rokas, A., and Hudson, B.G., 2018. The triple helix of collagens—an ancient protein structure that enabled animal multicellularity and tissue evolution. Journal of Cell Science 131(7): jcs203950. 10.1242/jcs.203950
Furtado, M., Chen, L., Chen, Z., Chen, A., and Cui, W., 2022. Development of fish collagen in tissue regeneration and drug delivery. Engineered Regeneration 3: 217–231. 10.1016/j.engreg.2022.05.002
Gaikwad, S., and Kim, M.J. 2024. Fish by-product collagen extraction using different methods and their application. Marine Drugs 22: 1–20. 10.3390/md22020060
Ganceviciene, R., Liakou, A.I., Theodoridis, A., Makrantonaki, E., and Zouboulis, C.C., 2012. Skin anti-aging strategies. Dermato-Endocrinology 4: 308–319. 10.4161/derm.22804
Gaurav, K.P., Nidheesh, T., Govindaraju, K., Jyoti and Suresh, P.V., 2017. Enzymatic extraction and characterisation of a thermostable collagen from swim bladder of rohu (Labeo rohita). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 97: 1451–1458. 10.1002/jsfa.7884
Gee, T.I., Woolrich, T.J., and Smith, M.F., 2019. Effectiveness of whey protein hydrolysate and milk-based formulated drinks on recovery of strength and power following acute resistance exercise. Journal of Human Kinetics 68: 783–789. 10.2478/hukin-2019-0066
Gomez-Guillen, M.C., Gimenez, B., Lopez-Caballero, M.E., and Montero, M.P., 2011. Functional and bioactive properties of collagen and gelatin from alternative sources: a review. Food Hydrocolloid 25: 1813–1827. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.02.007
Gordon, M.K., and Hahn, R.A., 2010. Collagens. Cell and Tissue Research 339: 247–257. 10.1007/s00441-009-0844-4
Goyal, D., Goyal, A., and Brittberg, M., 2013. Consideration of religious sentiments while selecting a biological product for knee arthroscopy. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 21: 1577–1586. 10.1007/s00167-012-2292-z
Grand View Research. 2023. Collagen market size and trends. Available at: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/collagen-market (Accessed: 20 December 2024)
Gutierrez-Canul, C.D., Can-Herrera, L.A., Ramírez-Rivera, E.D.J., Prinyawiwatkul, W., Sauri-Duch, E., Moo-Huchin, V.M., and Hernández-Núñez, E., 2025. A Review of Classical and Rising Approaches the Extraction and Utilization of marine collagen. BioTech 14(2): 26. 10.3390/biotech14020026
Hadfi, N.H., and Sarbon, N.M., 2019. Physicochemical properties of silver catfish (Pangasius sp.) skin collagen as influenced by acetic acid concentration. Food Research 3: 783–790. 10.26656/fr.2017.3(6).130
Hajj, W.A., Salla, M., Krayem, M., Khaled, S., Hassan, H.F., and El Khatib, S., 2024. Hydrolyzed collagen: exploring its applications in the food and beverage industries and assessing its impact on human health—a comprehensive review. Heliyon 10: e36433. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36433
Hamdan, F.S., and Sarbon, N.M., 2019. Isolation and characterisation of collagen from fringescale sardinella (Sardinella fimbriata) waste materials. International Food Research Journal 26(1): 133–140.
Hamed, E., Novitskaya, E., Li, J., Chen, P.Y., Jasiuk, I., and McKittrick, J., 2012. Elastic moduli of untreated, demineralized and deproteinized cortical bone: validation of a theoretical model of bone as an interpenetrating composite material. Acta Biomaterialia 8: 1080–1092. 10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2011.11.010
Hasanuddin, H., Jaziri, A.A., Shapawi, R., Mokhtar, R.A.M., Noordin, W.N.M., and Huda, N., 2024. Effect of different acids during collagen extraction the bone and fins from purple-spotted bigeye (Priacanthus tayenus Richardson, 1846) and their physicochemical properties. Food Research 8: 326–335.
Hasri, N.M., Zebua, N., and Sudewi., 2020. Test of burn wounds healing effects of collagen from snakehead fish (Channa striata) bone in the preparation of cream on male white rats (Rattus norvegicus). Indonesian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 3: 62–75.
Hazeena, S.H., Ming-Kuei, S., Shu-Ling, H., Chang-Wei, H., Liu, T.T., Min-Hung, C., Yu-Wen, H., and Chih-Yao, H., 2022. Structural characteristics of collagen from cuttlefish skin waste extracted at optimized conditions. International Journal of Food Properties 25: 2211–2222. 10.1080/10942912.2022.2127762
He, S., Yin, F., Wu, Y., Wang, M., Wang, Y., Row, K.H., and Tang, W., 2024. Deep eutectic solvents as extraction media for food-derived biomacromolecules. Trends in Analytical Chemistry (TrAC) 171: 17521. 10.1002/open.202100137
Hecht, F., Zocchi, M., Alimohammadi, F., and Harris, I.S., 2024. Regulation of antioxidants in cancer. Molecular Cell 84(1): 23–33. 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.001
Heidari, M.G., and Rezaei, M., 2022. Extracted pepsin of trout waste and ultrasound-promoted method for green recovery of fish collagen. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy 30: 100854. 10.1016/j.scp.2022.100854
Hong, H., Fan, H., Chalamaiah, M., and Wu, J., 2019. Preparation of low-molecular-weight, collagen hydrolysates (peptides): current progress, challenges, and future perspectives. Food Chemistry 301: 1–10. 10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2019.125222
Hong, H., Roy, B.C., Chalamaiah, M., Bruce, H.L., and Wu, J., 2018. Pretreatment with formic acid enhances the production of small peptides from highly cross-linked collagen of spent hens. Food Chemistry 258: 174–180. 10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2018.03.036
Hukmi, N.M.M., and Sarbon, N.M., 2018. Isolation and characterization of acid-soluble collagen (ASC) and pepsin soluble collagen (PSC) extracted from silver catfish (Pangasius sp.) skin. International Food Research Journal 25: 2601–2607.
Ibrahim, F.N., Ismail-Fitry, M.R., Mat Yusoff, M., and Shukri, R., 2020. Effects of fish collagen hydrolysate (FCH) as fat replacer in the production of buffalo patties. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology 11: 108–117.
Introspective Market Research. (2023). Collagen market: global insights, trends, and forecast 2023–2032. Available at: https://introspectivemarketresearch.com/reports/collagen-market/ (Accessed: 30 June 2024).
Ishak, N.H., and Sarbon, N.M., 2018. A Review of protein hydrolysates and bioactive peptides deriving from wastes generated by fish processing. Food and Bioprocess Technology 11: 2–16. 10.1007/s11947-017-1940-1
Islam, J., and Mis Solval, K.E., 2025. Recent advancements in marine collagen: exploring new sources, processing approaches, and nutritional applications. Marine Drugs 23(5): 190. 10.3390/md23050190
Jadach, B., Mielcarek, Z., and Osmałek, T., 2024. Use of collagen in cosmetic products. Current Issues in Molecular Biology 46(3): 2043–2070. 10.3390/cimb46030132
Jafari, H., Lista, A., Siekapen, M.M., Ghaffari-Bohlouli, P., Nie, L., Alimoradi, H., and Shavandi, A., 2020. Fish collagen: extraction, characterization, and applications for biomaterials engineering. Polymers 12: 1–36. 10.3390/polym12102230
Jayaprakash, S., Razeen, Z.M.A., Kumar, R.N., He, J., Milky, M.G., Renuka, R., and Sanskrithi, M.V., 2024. Enriched characteristics of poultry collagen over other sources of collagen and its extraction methods: a review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 273(1): 133004. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133004
Jaziri, A.A., Shapawi, R., Mokhtar, R.A.M., Noordin, W.N.M., and Huda, N., 2023. Extraction and characterization of type I collagen from parrotfish (Scarus sordidus Forsskål, 1775) scale solubilized with the aid of acetic acid and pepsin. International Journal of Biomaterials 2023(1): 7312447. 10.1155/2023/7312447
Jhawar, N., Wang, J.V., and Saedi, N., 2020. Oral collagen supplementation for skin aging: a fad or the future? Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 19: 910–912. 10.1111/jocd.13096
Jin, H.X., Xu, H.P., Li, Y., Zhang, Q.W., and Xie, H., 2019. Preparation and evaluation of peptides with potential antioxidant activity by microwave-assisted enzymatic hydrolysis of collagen from sea cucumber Acaudina molpadioides obtained from Zhejiang province in China. Marine Drugs 17(3): 169. 10.3390/md17030169
Jo, Y.J., Kim, J.H., Jung, K.H., Min, S.G., and Chun, J.Y., 2015. Effect of sub-and super-critical water treatment on physicochemical properties of porcine skin. Korean Journal of Food Science Animal Resources 35: 35–40. 10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.1.35
Jongjareonrak, A., Benjakul, S., Visessanguan, W., Nagai, T., and Tanaka, M., 2005. Isolation and characterisation of acid and pepsin-solubilised collagens from the skin of Brownstripe red snapper (Lutjanus vitta). Food Chemistry 93: 475–484. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.10.026
Jridi, M., Bardaa, S., Moalla, D., Rebaii, T., Souissi, N., Sahnoun, Z., and Nasri, M., 2015. Microstructure, rheological and wound healing properties of collagen-based gel from cuttlefish skin. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 77: 369–374. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.03.020
Kang, M., Yumnam, S., and Kim, S., 2018. Oral intake of collagen peptide attenuates ultraviolet B irradiation-induced skin dehydration in vivo by regulating hyaluronic acid synthesis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19: 1–12. 10.3390/ijms19113551
Kendler, S., Kobbenes, S.M.M., Jakobsen, A.N., Mukhatov, K., and Lerfall, J., 2023. The application of microwave and ultrasound technologies for extracting collagen from European plaice by-products. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 7: 1257635. 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1257635
Kim, D.U., Chung, H.C., Choi, J., Sakai, Y., and Lee, B.Y., 2018a. Oral intake of low-molecular-weight collagen peptide improves hydration, elasticity, and wrinkling in human skin: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Nutrients 10: 1–13. 10.3390/nu10070826
Kim, H., Ho, Y., Yun, K., Kim, J.H., Park, J., and Lee, N.H., 2012. Effects of ultrasonic treatment on collagen extraction from skins of the sea bass Lateolabrax japonicus. Fisheries Science 78: 485–490. 10.1007/s12562-012-0472-x
Kim, T.K., Hwang, K.E., Sung, J.M., Park, J.D., Kim, M.H., Jeon, K.H., and Choi, Y.S., 2018b. Replacement of pork back fat with pre-emulsion of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) sprout and collagen and its optimization for reduced-fat patties. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 42: e13576. 10.1111/jfpp.13576
Kim, S.H., Park, H.S., Lee, O.J., Chao, J.R., Park, H.J., Lee, J.M., Ju, H.W., Moon, B.M., Park, Y.R., Song, J.E., Khang, G., and Park, C.H., 2016. Fabrication of duck’s feet collagen–silk hybrid biomaterial for tissue engineering. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 85: 442–450. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.12.086
Kıyak, B.D., Çınkır, N.İ., Çelebi, Y., Malçok, S.D., Koç, G.Ç., Adal, S., Yüksel, A.N., Süfer, Ö., Karabacak, A.Ö., Ramniwas, S., and Pandiselvam, R., 2024. Advanced technologies for the collagen extraction from food waste—a review on recent progress. Microchemical Journal 201: 110404. 10.1016/j.microc.2024.110404
Kodous, M.F.S.A., 2020. Physicochemical properties of hydrolyzed collagen produced from chicken feet. Middle East Journal of Agricultural Research 9: 81–89. 10.36632/mejar/2020.9.1.8
Koizumi, S., Inoue, N., Shimizu, M., Kwon, C.J., Kim, H.Y., and Park, K.S., 2018. Effects of dietary supplementation with fish scales-derived collagen peptides on skin parameters and condition: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics 24: 397–402. 10.1007/10989-017-9626-0
Kumar, K.K., Singh, S., Chakraborthy, S., Das, J., Bajaj, M., Hemanth, V., Nair, M., Thota, L., and Banerjee, P., 2019. Recycling fish skin for utilization in food industry as an effective emulsifier and foam stabilizing agent. Turkish Journal of Biochemistry 44: 332–343. 10.1515/tjb-2018-0084
Kumar, S., Sugihara, F., Suzuki, K., Inoue, N., and Venkateswarathirukumara, S., 2015. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, clinical study on the effectiveness of collagen peptide on osteoarthritis. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 95: 702–707. 10.1002/jsfa.6752
LaRoche, E.M., Wu, W.J., Garcia, P., Song, B., Chun, C.K., Jones, C.K., Crane, A.R., O’Quinn, T.G., and Chao, M.D., 2022. Evaluation of skin-on goat meat processing on processing efficiency, carcass yield, meat quality, and sensory attributes. Meat Science 184: 108675. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108675
Lee, J., Koo, N., and Min, D.B., 2011. Reactive oxygen species, aging, and antioxidative nutraceuticals. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 3: 21–33. 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2004.tb00058.x
Lee, Y.I., Lee, S.G., Kim, E., Jung, I., Suk, J., Kim, J., and Lee, J.H., 2022. Anti-aging effect of an oral disintegrating collagen film: a prospective, single-arm study. International Journal of Dermatology 61: 54–61. 10.1111/ijd.15675
León-López, A., Fuentes-Jiménez, L., Hernández-Fuentes, A.D., Campos-Montiel, R.G., and Aguirre-álvarez, G., 2019a. Hydrolysed collagen from sheepskins as a source of functional peptides with antioxidant activity. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20: 1–17. 10.3390/ijms20163931
León-López, A., Morales-Peñaloza, A., Martínez-Juárez, V.M., Vargas-Torres, A., Zeugolis, D.I., and Aguirre-Álvarez, G., 2019b. Hydrolyzed collagen-sources and applications. Molecules 24: 1–16. 10.3390/molecules24224031
Li, C., Fu, Y., Daia, H., Wang, Q., Gao, R., and Zhang, Y., 2022. Recent progress in preventive effect of collagen peptides on photoaging skin and action mechanism. Food Science and Human Wellness 11: 218–229. 10.1016/j.fshw.2021.11.003
Li, P.H., Lu, W.C., Chan, Y.J., Ko, W.C., Jung, C.C., le Huynh, D.T., and Ji, Y.X., 2020. Extraction and characterization of collagen from sea cucumber (Holothuria cinerascens) and its potential application in moisturizing cosmetics. Aquaculture 515: 1–8. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734590
Li, L.Y., Zhao, Y.Q., He, Y., Chi, C.F., and Wang, B., 2018. Physicochemical and antioxidant properties of acid-and pepsin-soluble collagens from the scales of miiuy croaker (Miichthys miiuy). Marine Drugs 16(10): 1–19. 10.3390/md16100394
Liu, S., Chau-Sang, L., Liang, K., Wen, F., and Teoh, S.H., 2022. Marine collagen scaffolds in tissue engineering. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 74: 92–103. 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.10.011
Liu, Z., Su, Y., and Zeng, M., 2011. Amino acid composition and functional properties of giant red sea cucumber (Parastichopus californicus) collagen hydrolysates. Journal of Ocean University of China 10: 80–84. 10.1007/s11802-011-1787-4
Loh, X.J., Young, D.J., Guo, H., Tang, L., Wu, Y., Zhang, G., Tang, C., and Ruan, H. 2021. Pearl Powder—An Emerging Material for Biomedical Applications: A Review. Materials 14(11): 2797. 10.3390/ma14112797
Luo, J., Yang, X., Cao, Y., Li, G., Meng, Y., and Li, C., 2020. Structural characterization and in vitro immunogenicity evaluation of amphibian-derived collagen type II from the cartilage of Chinese Giant Salamander (Andrias davidianus). Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition 31: 1941–1960. 10.1080/09205063.2020.1786882
Maia, P.M., Melo, M.O., and Siqueira César, F.C., 2019. Topical application and oral supplementation of peptides in the improvement of skin viscoelasticity and density. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 18: 1693–1699. 10.1111/jocd.12893
Maione-Silva, L., de Castro, E.G., Nascimento, T.L., Cintra, E.R., Moreira, L.C., Cintra, B.A.S., Valadares, M.C., and Lima, E.M., 2019. Ascorbic acid encapsulated into negatively charged liposomes exhibits increased skin permeation, retention and enhances collagen synthesis by fibroblasts. Scientific Reports 9: 1–14. 10.1038/s41598-018-36682-9
Maliha, M., Rashid, T.U., and Rahman, M.M., 2024. Fabrication of collagen-sodium alginate based antibacterial and edible packaging material: performance evaluation using entropy-combined compromise solution (CoCoSo). Carbohydrate Polymer Technologies and Applications 8: 100582. 10.1016/j.carpta.2024.100582
Mata-Rigoto, J., Ribeiro, T.H.S., Stevanato, N., Sampaio, A.R., Ruiz, S.P., and Bolanho, B.C., 2019. Effect of açaí pulp, cheese whey, and hydrolysate collagen on the characteristics of dairy beverages containing probiotic bacteria. Journal of Food Process Engineering 42: 1–10. 10.1111/JFPE.12953
Matarsim, N.N., Jaziri, A.A., Shapawi, R., Mokhtar, R.A.M., Noordin, W.N.M., and Huda, N., 2023. Type I collagen from the skin of Barracuda (Sphyraena sp.) prepared with different organic acids: biochemical, microstructural and functional properties. Journal of Functional Biomaterials 14(2): 87. 10.3390/jfb14020087
Minh-Thuy, L.T., Okazaki, E., and Osako, K., 2014. Isolation and characterization of acid-soluble collagen from the scales of marine fishes from Japan and Vietnam. Food Chemistry 149: 264–270. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.10.094
Miranda, R.B., Weimer, P., and Rossi, R.C., 2021. Effects of hydrolyzed collagen supplementation on skin aging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Dermatology 60: 1449–1461. 10.1111/ijd.15518
Mokhtar, N.D., Wahab, W.A., Hamdan, N.A., Hadi, H.A., Hassan, M.S.A., and Bunnori, N.M., 2017. Extraction optimization and characterization of collagen from chicken (Gallus domesticus) feet. In: International Conference on Chemical, Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Sciences. pp. 79–85. DiRPUB Conference Proceedings, Kyoto, Japan.
Mrázek, P., Mokrejš, P., Gál, R., and Krejčí, O., 2018. Preparation of collagen concentrate from chicken feet. Waste Forum 4: 96–110. 10.3966/199115992018122906009
Munasinghe, K.A., Schwarz, J.G., and Whittiker, M., 2015. Utilization of chicken by-products to form collagen films. Journal of Food Process Engineering 2015: 1–6. 10.1155/2015/247013
Nasri, M., 2017. Protein hydrolysates and biopeptides: production, biological activities, and applications in foods and health benefits. A review. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research 81: 109–159. 10.1016/bs.afnr.2016.10.003
Nguyen, C.T., Yuan, M., Yu, J.S., Ye, T., Cao, H., and Xu, F., 2018. Isolation of ice structuring collagen peptide by ice affinity adsorption, its ice-binding mechanism and breadmaking performance in frozen dough. Journal of Food Biochemistry 42: 1–9. 10.1111/jfbc.12506
Nilsuwan, K., Chantakun, K., Chotphruethipong, L., and Benjakul, S., 2021. Development of hydrolysis and defatting processes for production of lowered fishy odor hydrolyzed collagen from fatty skin of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Foods 10: 1–16. 10.3390/foods10102257
Noorzai, S., Verbeek, C.J.R., Lay, M.C., and Swan, J., 2020. Collagen extraction from various waste bovine hide sources. Waste and Biomass Valorization 11: 5687–5698.
Noppakundilograt, S., Choopromkaw, S., and Kiatkamjornwong, S., 2018. Hydrolyzed collagen-grafted-poly[(acrylic acid)-co-(methacrylic acid)] hydrogel for drug delivery. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 135: 1–11. 10.1002/app.45654
Ocak, B., 2018. Film-forming ability of collagen hydrolysate extracted from leather solid wastes with chitosan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25: 4643–4655. 10.1007/s11356-017-0843-z
Ong, T.Y., Shaik, M.I., and Sarbon, N.M., 2021. Isolation and characterization of acid and pepsin soluble collagen extracted from sharpnose stingray (Dasyatis zugei) skin. Food Research 5: 214–224. 10.26656/fr.2017.5(3).322
Ouyang, J., Han, M., Majura, J.J., Chen, X., Tan, M., Chen, Z., Gao, J., Zheng, H., Lin, H., and Cao, W., 2024. Improvement of the antifreeze activity of tilapia skin collagen peptides through enzymatic supramolecular assembly approach. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 59: 3360–3372. 10.1111/ijfs.17082
Ouyang, Q.Q., Hu, Z., Lin, Z.P., Quan, W.Y., Deng, Y.F., Li, S.D., Li, P.W., and Chen, Y., 2018. Chitosan hydrogel in combination with marine peptides from tilapia for burns healing. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 112: 1191–1198. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.01.217
Pal, G.K., and Suresh, P.V., 2016. Sustainable valorisation of seafood by-products: recovery of collagen and development of collagen-based novel functional food ingredients. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 37: 201–215. 10.1016/j.ifset.2016.03.015
Pal, G.K., and Suresh, P.V., 2017. Comparative assessment of physico-chemical characteristics and fibril formation capacity of thermostable carp scales collagen. Materials Science and Engineering: C 70: 32–40. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.08.047
Palamutoğlu, R., and Kasnak, C., 2019. Antioxidant effect of fish collagen hydrolysate addition to meatballs. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology 5: 56–61. 10.22531/muglajsci.576757
Pan, Z., Ge, B., Wei, M., Elango, J., and Wu, W., 2023. Isolation and biochemical properties of type II collagen from blue shark (Prionace glauca) cartilage. Marine Drugs 21(5): 260. 10.3390/md21050260
Pang, S., Su, F.Y., Green, A., Salim, J., McKittrick, J., and Jasiuk, I., 2021. Comparison of different protocols for demineralization of cortical bone. Scientific Reports 11: 1–10. 10.1038/s41598-021-86257-4
Park, S.M., Kim, D.H., and Pang, E.K., 2017. Bone formation of demineralized human dentin block graft with different demineralization time: in vitro and in vivo study. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 45: 903–912. 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.03.007
Pei, Y., Yang, J., Liu, P., Xu, M., Zhang, X., and Zhang, L., 2013. Fabrication, properties and bioapplications of cellulose/collagen hydrolysate composite films. Carbohydrate Polymers 92: 1752–1760. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.029
Petcharat, T., Benjakul, S., Karnjanapratum, S., and Nalinanon, S., 2020. Ultrasound-assisted extraction of collagen from clown featherback (Chitala ornata) skin: yield and molecular characteristics. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 101: 648–658. 10.1002/jsfa.10677
Powell, T., Bowra, S., and Cooper, H.J., 2017. Subcritical water hydrolysis of peptides: amino acid side-chain modifications. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 28: 1775–1786. 10.1007/s13361-017-1676-1
Prestes, R.C., 2015. Collagen and its derivatives: characteristics and applications in meat products. Journal of Health Sciences 15: 65–74.
Prokopová, A., Gál, R., Mokrejš, P., and Pavlačková, J., 2022. Preparation of gelatin from broiler chicken stomach collagen. Foods 12(1): 127. 10.3390/foods12010127
Pucci, F., and Rooman, M., 2017. Physical and molecular bases of protein thermal stability and cold adaptation. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 42: 117–128. 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.12.007
Pyun, H.B., Kim, M., Park, J., Sakai, Y., Numata, N., Shin, J.Y., Shin, H.J., Kim, D.U., and Hwang, J.K., 2012. Effects of collagen tripeptide supplement on photoaging and epidermal skin barrier in UVb-exposed hairless mice. Preventive Nutrition and Food Science 17: 245–253. 10.3746/pnf.2012.17.4.245
Qi, L., Zhang, H., Guo, Y., Liu, H., and Zhang, C., 2024. Preparation, characterization and antioxidant activity analysis of three Maillard glycosylated bone collagen hydrolysates from chicken, porcine and bovine. Food Science and Human Wellness 13: 2002–2013. 10.26599/FSHW.2022.9250166
Qiu, W., Chen, X., Tian, Y., Wu, D., Du, M., and Wang, S., 2020. Protection against oxidative stress and anti-aging effect in Drosophila of royal jelly-collagen peptide. Food and Chemical Toxicology 135: 1–9. 10.1016/j.fct.2019.110881
Rajabimashhadi, Z., Gallo, N., Salvatore, L., and Lionetto, F., 2023. Collagen derived from fish industry waste: progresses and challenges. Polymers 15: 1–28. 10.3390/polym15030544
Ramadass, S.K., Nazir, L.S., Thangam, R., Perumal, R.K., Manjubala, I., Madhan, B., and Seetharaman, S., 2019. Type I collagen peptides and nitric oxide releasing electrospun silk fibroin scaffold: a multifunctional approach for the treatment of ischemic chronic wounds. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 175: 636–643. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.12.025
Ramadass, S.K., Perumal, S., Gopinath, A., Nisal, A., Subramanian, S., and Madhan, B., 2014. Sol–gel assisted fabrication of collagen hydrolysate composite scaffold: a novel therapeutic alternative to the traditional collagen scaffold. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Journal 6: 15015–15025. 10.1021/am502948g
Ran, X.G., and Wang, L.Y., 2014. Use of ultrasonic and pepsin treatment in tandem for collagen extraction from meat industry by-products. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 94: 585–590. 10.1002/jsfa.6299
Rezvani Ghomi, E., Nourbakhsh, N., Akbari Kenari, M., Zare, M., and Ramakrishna, S., 2021. Collagen-based biomaterials for biomedical applications. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B 109: 1986–1999. 10.1002/jbm.b.34881
Rizk, M.A., and Mostafa, N.Y., 2016. Extraction and characterization of collagen from buffalo skin for biomedical applications. Oriental Journal of Chemistry 32: 1601–1609. 10.13005/ojc/320336
Rosmawati, Abustam, E., Tawali, A.B., Said, M.I., and Sari, D.K., 2018. Chemical composition, amino acid and collagen content of snakehead (Channa striata) fish skin and bone. Scientific Research Journal 6: 1–4.
Roy, B.C., Omana, D.A., Betti, M., and Bruce, H.L., 2017. Extraction and characterization of gelatin from bovine lung. Food Science Technology Research 23: 255–266. 10.3136/fstr.23.255
Rýglová, Š., Braun, M., Suchý, T., Hř#x00ED;bal, M., Žaloudková, M., and Vištějnová, L., 2023. The investigation of batch-to-batch variabilities in the composition of isolates from fish and mammalian species using different protocols. Food Research International 169: 112798. 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112798
Salvatore, L., Gallo, N., Natali, M.L., Campa, L., Lunetti, P., Madaghiele, M., Blasi, F.S., Corallo, A., Capobianco, L., and Sannino, A., 2020. Marine collagen and its derivatives: versatile and sustainable bio-resources for healthcare. Materials Science and Engineering: C 113: 31–41. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110963
Salvatore, L., Natali, M.L., Brunetti, C., Sannino, A., and Gallo, N. 2023. An update on the clinical efficacy and safety of collagen injectables for aesthetic and regenerative medicine applications. Polymers 15: 1–39. 10.3390/polym15041020
Schmidt, M.M., Dornelles, R.C.P., Mello, R.O., Kubota, E.H., Mazutti, M.A., Kempka, A.P., and Demiate, I.M., 2016. Collagen extraction process. International Food Research Journal 23: 913–922.
Senadheera, T.R.L., Dave, D., and Shahidi, F., 2020. Sea cucumber derived type I collagen: a comprehensive review. Marine Drugs 18: 1–44. 10.3390/md18090471
Seong, S.H., Lee, Y.I., Lee, J., Choi, S., Kim, I.A., Suk, J., Jung, I., Baeg, C., Kim, J., Oh, D., and Lee, J.H. 2024. Low-molecular-weight collagen peptides supplement promotes a healthy skin: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 23: 554–562. 10.1111/jocd.16026
Shahidi, F., Varatharajan, V., Peng, H., and Senadheera, R., 2019. Utilization of marine by-products for the recovery of value-added products. Journal of Food Bioactives 6: 10–61. 10.31665/jfb.2019.6184
Shaik, M.I., Asrul Effendi, N.F., and Sarbon, N.M., 2021a. Functional properties of sharpnose stingray (Dasyatis zugei) skin collagen by ultrasonication extraction as influenced by organic and inorganic acids. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 35: 1–6. 10.1016/j.bcab.2021.102103
Shaik, M.I., Chong, J.Y., and Sarbon, N.M., 2021b. Effect of ultrasound-assisted extraction on the extractability and physicochemical properties of acid and pepsin soluble collagen derived from Sharpnose stingray (Dasyatis zugei) skin. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 38: 1–11. 10.1016/j.bcab.2021.102218
Shaik, M.I., Kadir, A.N.A., and Sarbon, N.M., 2024a. Physicochemical and thermal properties of pepsin-and acid-soluble collagen isolated from the body wall of sea cucumbers (Stichopus hermanni). Journal of Food Science 89: 320–329. 10.1111/1750-3841.16858
Shaik, M.I., Md Nor, I.N., and Sarbon, N.M., 2023. Effect of extraction time on the extractability and physicochemical properties of pepsin-soluble collagen (PCS) from the skin of silver catfish (Pangasius sp.). Gels 9: 1–14. 10.3390/gels9040300
Shaik, M.I., Rahman, S.H.A., Yusri, A.S., Ismail-Fitry, M.R., Kumar, N.S.S., and Sarbon, N.M., 2024b. A review on the processing technique, physicochemical, and bioactive properties of marine collagen. Journal of Food Science 89: 5205–5229. 10.1111/1750-3841.17273
Sila, A., and Bougatef, A., 2016. Antioxidant peptides from marine by-products: isolation, identification and application in food systems. A review. Journal of Functional Foods 21: 10–26. 10.1016/j.jff.2015.11.007
Silva, T.H., Moreira-Silva, J., Marques, A.L.P., Domingues, A., Bayon, Y., and Reis, R.L., 2014. Marine origin collagens and its potential applications. Marine Drugs 12: 5881–5901. 10.3390/md12125881
Silva, I., Vaz, B.M., Sousa, S., Pintado, M.M., Coscueta, E.R., and Ventura, S.P., 2024. Gastrointestinal delivery of codfish skin-derived collagen hydrolysates: deep eutectic solvent extraction and bioactivity analysis. Food Research International 175: 113729. 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113729
Silvipriya, K., Kumar, K., Bhat, A., Kumar, B., John, A., and Lakshmanan, P., 2015. Collagen: animal sources and biomedical application. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science 5: 123–127. 10.7324/JAPS.2015.50322
Sinaga, W.S.L. Br., Ismaya, W.T., Retroningrum, D.S., Tjandrawinata, R.R., and Suhartono, M.T., 2020. Peptides hydrolysate derived from collagen of snakehead murrel (Channa striata) skin demonstrate anti-cholesterol and anti-oxidant activities. Journal of Biosciences 27: 1–6. 10.4308/hjb.27.2.136
Sionkowska, A., Adamiak, K., Musial, K., and Gadomska, M., 2020. Collagen-based materials in cosmetic applications: a review. Materials 13: 1–15. 10.3390/MA13194217
Skierka, E., and Sadowska, M., 2007. The influence of different acids and pepsin on the extractability of collagen from the skin of Baltic cod (Gadus morhua). Food Chemistry 105: 1302–1306. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.030
Son, S.A., Shin, E.S., Park, Y.M., Ma, A., Yang, H., Kim, S., and Shin, T.S., 2022. Composition of collagen extracted from the skin of three different varieties of fish. Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition 51(1): 71–81. 10.3746/jkfn.2022.51.1.71
Song, Z., Liu, H., Huang, A., Zhou, C., Hong, P., and Deng, C., 2022. Collagen/zein electrospun films incorporated with gallic acid for tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) muscle preservation. Journal of Food Engineering 317: 110860. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2021.110860
Sorushanova, A., Delgado, L.M., Wu, Z., Shologu, N., Kshirsagar, A., Raghunath, R., Mullen, A.M., Bayon, Y., Pandit, A., Raghunath, M., and Zeugolis, D.I., 2019. The collagen suprafamily: from biosynthesis to advanced biomaterial development. Advances Materials 31: 1–39. 10.1002/adma.201801651
Sousa, S.C., Fragoso, S.P., Penna, C.R.A., Arcanjo, N.M.O., Silva, F.A.P., Ferreira, V.C.S., Barreto, M.D.S., and Araújo, Í.B.S., 2017. Quality parameters of frankfurter-type sausages with partial replacement of fat by hydrolyzed collagen. Food Sciences and Technology (LWT). 76: 320–325. 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.06.034
Sukeri, N., Sampath Kumar, N.S., Shaik, M.I., and Sarbon, N.M., 2021. Extractability and physicochemical properties of cobia (Rachycentron canadum) skin collagen as influenced by lactic acid concentration. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 45: 1–8. 10.1111/jfpp.15080
Sulaiman, A.W., and Sarbon, N.M., 2020. Characterization of acid soluble collagen (ASC) and pepsin soluble collagen (PSC) extracted from shortfin scad (Decapterus macrosoma) waste. Food Research 4: 2272–2280. 10.26656/fr.2017.4(6).267
Tawalbeh, D., Kha’sim, M.I., Mhd Sarbon, N., and Sarbon, N.M., 2025. Techno-functional and bioactivity properties of collagen hydrolysate and peptide: a review. Food Reviews International 41(5): 1509–1537. 10.1080/87559129.2025.2450052
Thirukumaran, R., Priya, V.K.A., Krishnamoorthy, S., Ramakrishnan, P., Moses, J.A., and Anandharamakrishnan, C., 2022. Resource recovery from fish waste: Prospects and the usage of intensified extraction technologies. Chemosphere 299: 1–17. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134361
Truong, T.M.T., Nguyen, V.M., Tran, T.T., and Le, T.M.T., 2021. Characterization of acid-soluble collagen from food processing by-products of snakehead fish (Channa striata). Processes 9(7): 1188. 10.3390/pr9071188
Usman, R., and Bharadvaja, N., 2023. Nutricosmetics: role in health, nutrition, and cosmetics. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy 89(3): 584–599. 10.1007/s43538-023-00181-x
Valenzuela-Rojo, D., López-Cervantes, J., and Sánchez-Machado, D.I., 2018. Tilapia (Oreochromis aureus) collagen for medical biomaterials. In: Maiti, S. (Ed.), Seaweed Biomaterials (E-book). IntechOpen, Chap. 4. 10.5772/intechopen.77051
Veeruraj, A., Arumugam, M., Ajithkumar, T., and Balasubramanian, T., 2015. Isolation and characterization of collagen from the outer skin of squid (Doryteuthis singhalensis). Food Hydrocolloid 43: 708–716. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.07.025
Veeruraj A., Liu L., Zheng J., Wu J., Arumugam M., 2019. Evaluation of astaxanthin incorporated collagen film developed from the outer skin waste of squid Doryteuthis singhalensis for wound healing and tissue regenerative applications. Materials Science and Engineering: C 95: 29–42. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.10.055
Vidal, A.R., Cansian, R.L., Mello, R.D.O., Demiate, I.M., Kempka, A.P., Dornelles, R.C.P., Rodriguez, J.M.L., and Campagnol, P.C.B., 2022. Production of collagens and protein hydrolysates with antimicrobial and antioxidant activity from sheep slaughter by-products. Antioxidants 11: 1173. 10.3390/antiox11061173
Vidal, A.R., Duarte, L.P., Schmidt, M.M., Cansian, R.L., Fernandes, I.A., de Oliveira Mello, R., Demiate, I.M., and Dornelles, R.C.P., 2020. Extraction and characterization of collagen from sheep slaughter by-products. Waste Management 102: 838–846.
Villamil, O., Váquiro, H., and Solanilla, J.F., 2017. Fish viscera protein hydrolysates: production, potential applications and functional and bioactive properties. Food Chemistry 224: 160–171. 10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2016.12.057
Wang, Y.T., Chen, L.L., and Zhao, L., 2013. Application of skins collagen in mayonnaise. Advanced Materials Research 781–784: 1786–1790. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.781-784.1786
Wang, L., Liang, Q., Wang, Z., Xu, J., Liu, Y., and Ma, H., 2014. Preparation and characterisation of type I and V collagens from the skin of Amur sturgeon (Acipenser schrenckii). Food Chemistry 148: 410–414. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.10.074
Wang, P., Jiang, J., Pan, D., Sun, Y., Wu, Z., Cao, J., and Zeng, X., 2016. Effects of goose collagen and collagen peptide on osteoporosis. International Journal of Food Properties 19: 2190–2201. 10.1080/10942912.2015.1115414
Wei, P., Zheng, H., Shi, Z., Li, D., and Xiang, Y., 2019. Isolation and characterization of acid-soluble collagen and pepsin-soluble collagen from the skin of hybrid sturgeon. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Materials Science Edition 34: 950–959. 10.1007/s11595-019-2143-6
Wijanarko, A., Januardi Ginting, M., Sahlan, M., Krisanta Endah Savitri, I., Florensia, Y., Regina Sudiarta, M., Pastika S., Rafiki F., and Hermansyah, H., 2017. Saponin isolation as main ingredients of insecticide and collagen type I from crown of thorn–starfish (Acanthaster planci). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (IOPscience) 89: 1–20. 10.1088/1755-1315/89/1/012032
Wu, S.L., Kang, H.B., and Li, D.J., 2017. Technology for extracting effective components from fish scale. Journal of Food Engineering 7: 351–358. 10.17265/2159-5828/2017.07.003
Wu, R., Wu, C., Liu, D., Yang, X., Huang, J., Zhang, J., Liao, B., and He, H., 2018. Antioxidant and anti-freezing peptides from salmon collagen hydrolysate prepared by bacterial extracellular protease. Food Chemistry 248: 346–352. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.12.035
Xu, J., Luo, X., Zhang, Y., Gao, J., Ching-Cheng, H., Bai, X., and Zhang, G., 2022. Extraction and characterization of bovine collagen Type V and its effects on cell behaviors. Regenerative Biomaterials 9: 1–11. 10.1093/rb/rbac028
Xu, S., Zhao, Y., Song, W., Zhang, C., Wang, Q., Li, R., Shen, Y., Gong, S., Li, M., and Sun, L., 2023. Improving the sustainability of processing by-products: extraction and recent biological activities of collagen peptides. Foods 12: 1–18. 10.3390/foods12101965
Yang, H., and Shu, Z., 2014. The extraction of collagen protein from pigskin. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research 6: 683–687.
Yousefi, M., Ariffin, F., and Huda, N., 2017. An alternative source of type I collagen based on by-product with higher thermal stability. Food Hydrocolloid 63: 372–382. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.09.029
Yu, F., Li, P., Gao, L., Cai, S., Gu, K., and Wang, W., 2018. A second-generation current controlled current conveyor realization using cascode current mirror: a CCCII realization using cascode current mirror. In: International Conference on Communications, Circuits, and Systems. pp. 1–5. IEEE, New York, USA. 10.1109/ICCCAS.2018.8769163
Zhang, Q.X., Fu, R.J., Yao, K., Jia, D.Y., He, Q., and Chi, Y.L., 2018. Clarification effect of collagen hydrolysate clarifier on chrysanthemum beverage. Food Science and Technology (LWT) 91: 70–76. 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.01.041
Zhang, Y., Olsen, K., Grossi, A., and Otte, J., 2013. Effect of pretreatment on enzymatic hydrolysis of bovine collagen and formation of ACE-inhibitory peptides. Food Chemistry 141: 2343–2354. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.058
Zheng, Y., Li, Y., Ke, C., Gao, X., Liu, Z., and Chen, J. 2024. Comparison of structural and physicochemical characteristics of skin collagen from chum salmon (cold-water fish) and Nile Tilapia (warm-water fish). Foods 13: 1–18. 10.3390/foods13081213
Zhong, M., Chen, T., Hu, C., and Ren, C., 2015. Isolation and characterization of collagen from the body wall of sea cucumber Stichopus monotuberculatus. Journal of Food Science 80: C671–C679. 10.1111/1750-3841.12826
Zhou, D.Y., Tang, Y., Zhu, B.W., Qin, L., Li, D.M., Yang, J.F., Lei, K., and Murata, Y., 2012. Antioxidant activity of hydrolysates obtained from scallop (Patinopecten yessoensis) and abalone (Haliotis discus hannai Ino) muscle. Food Chemistry 132: 815–822. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.11.041
Zin, M.T., Kaewkod, T., Pekkoh, J., Pathom-aree, W., Chaipoot, S., Kanthakat, G., Seesuriyachan, P., Chen, Y.Y., Khoo, K.S., Cheirsilp, B., and Srinuanpan, S., 2025. Integrated deep eutectic solvent (DES) extraction and microwave-assisted process for algal protein extraction: process improvement, characterizations, functional properties, and antioxidant and anti-colorectal cancer potentials. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 19: 101673. 10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101673
Znamirowska, A., Szajnar, K., and Pawlos, M., 2020. Probiotic fermented milk with collagen. Dairy 1: 126–134. 10.3390/dairy1020008
Zou, Y., Yang, H., Zhang, X., Xu, P., Jiang, D., Zhang, M., Xu, W., and Wang, D., 2020. Effect of ultrasound power on extraction kinetic model, and physicochemical and structural characteristics of collagen from chicken lung. Food Production, Processing and Nutrition 2(3): 1–12. 10.1186/s43014-019-0016-1