1Department of Soils, Water and Agricultural Engineering, College of Agricultural & Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman;
2Department of Natural Resource Economics, College of Agricultural & Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman
Food loss and waste reduction efforts have received a lot of attention recently because of their importance in enhancing food security and environmental sustainability. Value addition of agricultural products is the key to a higher production rate, fewer food losses, and hence more farm income and a better economy. In Oman, agriculture is represented as the first source of life and date is considered one of the most important permanent cultivated crops. This study aimed to evaluate the value addition process of the date palm products and reveal the challenges associated with the productivity improvement in Oman. Six prominent date value-addition factories were visited for data collection. The most date value-added products found were date with nuts, date syrup, and paste, and industries are using most popular date varieties Khalas and Fardh for the value addition processes. Raw dates are supplied by three farm categories and four process mechanization levels were found in these factories. The financial productivity improvement due to the value addition were evaluated. Date with nuts found to be with the highest productivity ratio that reaching up to 540% in Khalas and 360% in Fardh. Highly productive factories had high mechanization levels (ML3–4). A broader improvement in value addition industry is essential to improve the productivities. This includes increase in number of small and medium enterprises, improve mechanization levels, technology transfer, and capacity building needs and additionally to improve the quality of value-added products which will positively affect the farm income and country’s economy.
Key words: Date fruit, mechanization level, postharvest, productivity, value-added products
*Corresponding Author: Pankaj B. Pathare, Department of Soils, Water and Agricultural Engineering, College of Agricultural & Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Received: 18 April 2022; Accepted: 24 June 2022; Published: 12 October 2022
DOI: 10.15586/qas.v14iSP1.1110
© 2022 Codon Publications
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
Food production is continued to be squandered and wasted on a global scale. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates that roughly 14% of food is lost before it reaches the market, resulting in a $400 billion loss each year (FAO, 2020). Around a quarter of all agricultural land, water, and fertilizers needed in crop production are lost or wasted, accounting for one-third of total global food output (Shafiee-Jood & Cai, 2016). Postharvest losses have an environmental impact due to attrition in the use of lands, water, energy, and labor in the production of non-consumable products (FAO, 2013). Food loss and waste reduction efforts have recently gained a lot of attention for their role in improving food security and environmental sustainability (Shafiee-Jood & Cai, 2016).
Adding value to agricultural products is one of the most essential aspects of increasing agricultural output, reducing food waste, and boosting farmer-market ties (Kiaya, 2014). Evans (2012) characterized it as a process so that agricultural producers can use to create a new commodity outside of the established framework to increase their profits. According to several studies, adding value to agricultural products helps to improve productivity and product sustainability (Ravi & Swaminathan, 2012; Al Hinai & Jayasuriya, 2021). The long-term viability of boosting production, minimizing post-harvest losses, and expanding cultivated areas is a critical issue in the operations of production to meet food demand and achieve food security (Kiaya, 2014).
Agricultural machinery, which is involved in all stages of production right from crop planting through harvesting and food processing, is strongly linked with value addition. Agricultural mechanization is a method of increasing agricultural and food production by increasing cropping intensities, eliminating drudgery from some labor-intensive farm and processing activities and eradicating poverty. It is considered one of the greatest engineering achievements of the twentieth century (Clarke, 2000; Hossen, 2019). Seeds, fertilizers, water, labor, and time are examples of manufacturing inputs and production management (Fadavi et al., 2010). There is an increasing demand for agricultural machines as they have been proved to reduce production costs and enhance farmer income (Clarke, 2000; Jayasuriya et al., 2017).
For Oman, agriculture was history’s earliest source of life, with various cultivated crops (MAF, 2017). The economy of Oman is built on crude oil revenues, which account for 51% of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP), while agriculture accounts for only 1.2% of the country’s GDP, which is predicted to rise to 3.1% by 2020 (OBG, 2018). In Oman, the date palm is a permanent crop that spans a large region among other fruits and vegetables. On the other hand, the postharvest losses in fruit can reach an average of 28% in which date is a part of it and about 28% in vegetables (Al-Dairi et al., 2021; Al-Lawati et al., 2016). The Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries has several programs in place to improve land productivity and the quality of agricultural products, particularly the dates needed to achieve food security (MAF, 2011a; Al-Hinai et al., 2022a). Recently, interest in date products has increased among international consumers (Abdallah et al., 2019). Improving the date palm products through value addition is essential to increase the production value and quality, reduce postharvest losses, and raise the income of farms and the country’s economy. A lack of postharvest processing and value-added activities integrated into the production system is causing low agricultural productivity in Oman (Dhehibi et al., 2018). Low mechanization at the processing level is one of the main factors contributing to the impairment. The adoption of the value addition process in date products can be the solution to avoid the problems related to the productivity of dates, which is the main focus of this study. Therefore, this study is aimed to evaluate the value addition process of the date palm products and reveal the scope and challenges associated with the productivity improvement in Oman.
The date palm is the most widely grown crop in Oman, accounting for around 80% of all other fruits and 50% of all cultivated crops (Al-Yahyai and Khan, 2015; Al-Hinai and Jayasuriya, 2021). More than 200 date varieties may be found in diverse locations of Oman (Ishag, 2017), and the top ten varieties are shown in Table 1 (MAF, 2019a). With an annual output rate of 377,000 tons in 2019, Oman is the world’s eighth-largest date producer (Al-Yahyai & Khan, 2015; MAF, 2019b; NCSI, 2020).
Table 1. The highest cultivated date varieties in Oman (MAF, 2019a).
| Date variety | Date production (ton) | Production (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Naghal | 37,167 | 9.86 |
| Khisab | 35,504 | 9.42 |
| Khalas | 35,225 | 9.35 |
| Al-Mabsili | 32,708 | 8.68 |
| Umm Al-Salla | 30,151 | 8.00 |
| Fardh | 24,847 | 6.59 |
| Khunizi | 21,152 | 5.61 |
| Shahal | 19,850 | 5.27 |
| Abu Da’an | 11,116 | 2.95 |
| Madluki | 10,877 | 2.89 |
The farm landholdings are numerous and fragmented in different governorates of Oman. The highest number of farm landholdings are located in Al-Dakhiliyah, North Al-Sharqiyah, and South Al-Batinah Governorates with about 21,600, 18,000, and 13,500 respectively (MAF, 2010). The number and percentage of farm landholdings in Oman are shown in Table 2 (Jayasuriya et al., 2017, ACoO, 2020).
Table 2. The mechanization levels with different farm classifications, land holdings and covering areas (Jayasuriya et al., 2017; ACoO, 2020).
| Farm classification | Farm size range in hectare (ha) | No. of landholding | Landholding (%) | Total area (%) | Mechanization level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small | 0–0.84 | 122,829 | 79.76 | 11.9 | Minimal |
| Medium | 0.84–12.6 | 21,091 | 19.56 | 58.7 | Moderate |
| Large | >12.6 | 1051 | 0.69 | 29.4 | High |
In Oman, 82% of landholdings are owned by individuals, while 5% are controlled by groups. About 72% of agricultural products produced in farmlands are consumed in the home, 25% are sold locally, 0.9% are exported, 0.1% are processed, and 2% are utilized for other purposes (MAF, 2010).
The farming system in Oman is divided into three categories based on total area and mechanization levels (ML): small, medium, and large farms as shown in Table 2.
The coastal line of Al Batinah North Governorate, parts of Al-Dakhiliyah Governorate (Nizwa and Bahla), and Dhofar Governorate (Salalah) are home to all types of farm systems (Jayasuriya et al., 2017; MAF, 2010).
Small farms (0–0.84 ha) account for 79.76% of all farm land-holdings, but only 11.9% of the total farmed area with low mechanization, according to Table 2. In a medium farm system, the overall holding area is approximately 0.84–12.6 ha, which accounts for 19.5% of landholdings and 58.7% of the total farming area with a moderate mechanization. Many farm owners in the moderate farm system are having difficulty in marketing their products as imported commodities become more competitive and there are fluctuations in selling prices (Jayasuriya et al., 2017). In a large farm system, the overall holding area exceeds 12.6 ha, accounting for 0.69% of landholdings and 29.4% of farmland. This system is highly mechanized as some of these farming estates have good agricultural practices (GAP) licenses and export their crops to worldwide markets in Europe and the United States (Jayasuriya et al., 2017).
Various publications have given different statistics on the land productivity of dates in Oman. According to Al-Mulla & Al-Gheilani (2017), the average date output per hectare is around 6.075 tons, with an average income of 1065 Omani Rial (OMR). According to the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, around 6.930 tons of date are produced per hectare (MAF, 2011b). FAOSTAT (2019) indicated the date production and the land productivity numbers for the years 2015–2019, as shown in Table 3. This discrepancy could be related to the fact that there are over 200 varieties with variable yields, as well as the usage of different tree spacing and other reasons.
Table 3. Indication of date production and land productivity in Oman (FAOSTAT, 2019).
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Production (tons) | 344690 | 355332 | 360917 | 368808 | 372572 |
| Area harvested (ha) | 24120 | 24120 | 24617 | 25125 | 25382 |
| Land productivity (tons/ha) | 14.291 | 14.731 | 14.661 | 14.679 | 14.679 |
| Per palm yield (kg/palm) | 114.3 | 117.2 | 117.3 | 117.4 | 117.4 |
The water productivity of dates is reported as 0.570 kg/m3 and the water productivity based on cost is reported to be 0.630 OMR/m3 (Al-Mulla & Al-Gheilani, 2017), and average labor productivity is reported to be around 0.815 kg/ha (MAF 2011b).
Several prominent date factories in Oman were visited to gather information on value-added products, processes, and mechanization levels. Six notable date manufacturers were chosen, and it was discovered that the majority of them use two date varieties for the value addition process: Khalas and Fardh. Three common value-added products from several date varieties were chosen, and the range of data variance between six factories was taken into account during the analysis. The details of the date varieties and value-added products selections of different factories in Oman are shown in Table 4.
Table 4. The selection of date factories, varieties, and value-added products.
| Factory code (Location in Oman) | Date variety | Type of value addition |
|---|---|---|
| A (Smail) | 1. Khalas | 1. Date with nuts |
| B (Bahla) | 2. Fardh | 2. Date syrup |
| C (Nizwa) | 3. Date paste | |
| D (Barka) | ||
| E (Ibri) | ||
| F (Nizwa) |
Individual, group, and small and medium enterprises (SME) type date value-added (DVA) process categories were studied by considering the total farm area and proportion of farm landholdings in each category is provided in Table 5. According to Table 2, the selected categories for this study account for 89% of farm land-holdings and 99% of farming areas. Individual holdings account for around 82% of farm categories in Oman, followed by group farms at 5% and other farm categories at 13% (MAF, 2010; Al-Hinai et al., 2022a).
Table 5. The distribution of the total area and farm landholdings percentage of the selected DVA process category (MAF, 2010; ACoO, 2020).
| DVA process category | Total farm area (ha) | Farm landholdings (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Individual farm | 0–0.84 | 79.76 |
| Group farm | 0.84–2.1 | 9.33 |
| SMEs farm | 2.1–12.6 | 10.23 |
| Others | >12.6 | 0.68 |
On a global scale, Krause and Poesse (1997) identified mechanization levels based on their sophistication. The categorization of mechanization is subjective to the region, country, and application activity, ranging from land preparation to postharvest processing (Mrema et al., 2014; Pradan et al., 2016).
Based on the method/steps of technology adoption and mechanization in different date value addition processes by selected date manufacturers, four mechanization levels were determined in this study. Table 6 illustrates the proportion of mechanization based on the number of mechanized operations compared to the total number of processing activities, classified into four levels, ML-1 to ML-4.
Table 6. List of Activities used in date value addition process and the mechanization level classification.
| Activities in the value addition process and mechanization level (ML) classification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dates with Nuts | Date Syrup | Date Paste |
|
|
|
| Up to 2 activities—ML-1 Up to 4 activities—ML-2 Up to 6 activities—ML-3 More than 7 activities—ML-4 |
Up to 2 activities—ML-1 Up to 3 activities—ML-2 Up to 4 activities—ML-3 More than 5 activities—ML-4 |
Up to 2 activities—ML-1 Up to 3 activities—ML-2 Up to 4 activities—ML-3 More than 5 activities—ML-4 |
The following equation is used to calculate the benefit of value-added products (Lewbel, 2003):
Net income = selling price (value – added) – purchase price (raw) – value addition cost. (Eq. 1)
where selling price, purchase price, and value-added product are in OMR/ton
The following calculation is used to compute the net profit-based productivity ratio (Farooq et al., 2001):
The following are the main data on land, water, and labor productivity for raw date products, as determined by literature reviews: date palm planting density of 125 palms/ha (Kotagama et al., 2014), average raw date price of 0.400 OMR (Al-Mulla & Al-Gheilani, 2017) and, land productivity 6.930 ton/ha (MAF, 2011).
According to the data collected from the selected date factories, Khalas and Fardh are the varieties used for value addition because of their availability, higher production compared to other varieties, consistency in sugar content (Fardh has less sugar than Khalas), low purchase cost, and more economic value. The three selected value-added products; date with nuts, date syrup and date paste are the most date value-added products that are produced in Oman for both local and export markets.
Table 7 shows the survey results for various date value-added products and the related mechanization levels. The number of mechanized production activities used by the factory for the specific value addition process was used to determine the percentage of mechanization level.
Table 7. Date factories with various value-added products and mechanization levels (Al Hinai & Jayasuriya 2021).
| Factory / Location in Oman | Date variety | Type of value addition | Mechanization level (ML) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A (From Samail) |
Khalas and Fardh | Date with nuts | ML-3 (57% mechanized) 4 operations out of 7 (sort, wash, dry, seeds removal) |
| Fardh | Date syrup | ML-1 (17% mechanized) 1 operation out of 6 (wash) | |
| B (From Bahla) |
Khalas and Fardh | Date with nuts | ML-3 (57% mechanized) 4 operations out of 7 (sort, wash, dry, seeds removal) |
| Date syrup | ML-1 (17% mechanized) 1 operation out of 6 (wash) | ||
| Date paste | ML-4 (100% mechanized) | ||
| C (From Nizwa) |
Khalas and Fardh | Date with nuts | ML-3 (57% mechanized) 4 operations out of 7 (sort, wash, dry, seeds removal) |
| Fardh | Date syrup | ML-1 (17% mechanized) 1 operation out of 6 (wash) | |
| D (From Barka) |
Khalas and Fardh | Date with nuts | ML-3 (57% mechanized) 4 operations out of 7 (sort, wash, dry, pack) |
| Date with nuts | ML-3 (57% mechanized) 4 operations out of 7 (sort, wash, dry, seeds removal) | ||
| Khalas | Date paste | ML-4 (100% mechanized) | |
| E (From Ibri) |
Khalas and Fardh | Date with nuts | ML-3 (57% mechanized) 4 operations out of 7 (sort, wash, dry, seeds removal) |
| Khalas | Date paste | ML-4 (100% mechanized) | |
| F (From Nizwa) |
Khalas and Fardh | Date with nuts | ML-1 (14% mechanized) 1 operation out of 7 (pack) |
| Khalas | Date paste | ML-2 (33% mechanized) 2 operations out of 6 (knead and pack) |
The results of the productivity ratios estimated related to the six date factories are shown in Table 8 based on the selected value-added product, cost of the raw date, cost of the value-added product, and net income of the value-added product.
Table 8. The ranges of productivity ratios of the two selected date verities and three value-added products of the six dates factories (Al-Hinai et al., 2022a; Al Hinai & Jayasuriya, 2021).
| Value-added product | Cost for the raw product (OMR/ton) | Cost of the value-added product (OMR/ton) | The selling price of value-added product (OMR/ton) | Net income (OMR/ton) | Productivity ratio (net profit basis) (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Khalas dates | |||||
| Date with nuts | 500–800 | 400–626 | 1500–3200 | 500–2200 | 183–540 |
| Date syrup | 2400 | 100 | 5000 | 2500 | 204 |
| Date paste | 500–600 | 100–300 | 850–1200 | 150-400 | 130–180 |
| Fardh dates | |||||
| Date with nuts | 400–800 | 350–872 | 1500–3200 | 400–834 | 183–360 |
| Date syrup | 4200–4800 | 100 | 5000–7500 | 400–2600 | 109–180 |
| Date paste | 700 | 100 | 1000 | 200 | 129 |
Table 8 shows that date with nuts in the Khalas variety showed the highest productivity ratio that reached up to 540% and this is because of the large disparity between the selling price and the value-addition cost between the raw date and the final products for about 2500 OMR/ ton. Date paste comes in second place with a productivity ratio of 204%, followed by date paste with a productivity ratio of 180%.
Dates with nuts have the highest productivity ratio in the Fardh variety, similar to Khalas variety, but lower than Khalas, reached up to 360%, owing to the higher cost of value-addition activities, as indicated in Table 8. Like the Khalas variety, date syrup reached second-highest productivity ratio of 180%, followed by 129% for date paste. As a contribution to postharvest loss reduction, productivity is increased by applying modern technology and research. Value addition can be one of the best options to achieve sustainability goals, minimize food waste, and improve product quality and exports through improved productivity (Al-Hinai et al., 2022a) .
Due to the one-season harvesting, the date palm indus-try’s biggest challenge is the vast volume of dates that arrive to the market at the same time, leading to low prices. The date value-addition industry is in its infant-state with low processing capacities and low mechanization adoption. Despite the fact that the country is a major producer of dates, poor postharvest handling and processing results in low market prices due to seasonal gluts and distress sales, as well as significant losses. However, the postharvest handling is considered as the weakest node of the date palm value chain where greatest loss occurs (Dhehibi et al., 2018). Indeed, to have a good and decent market price, the date value addition sector should be strong.
Despite the big growing market size and demand projections, the date industry faces several challenges. The date production base across the Oman is smallholder dominated, and with low yield as well as low productivity. Eighty percent of the total land holdings belong to small farmers with average holding size is up to 0.82 ha, limiting the scope for introduction of technology innovations and interventions. Farmers, who are very traditional, many are part-time farmers, are reluctant to accept new value-added technology, resulting in a massive market surplus and low returns. Further, there are changes in socioeconomic situations, with younger generations from farming communities preferring urban jobs over farm jobs. The majority of small-scale date farmers are absent, and the farming system is run by foreign laborers. These workers have little education and must be taught correct postharvest methods from beginning to end.
Moreover, the necessary value-adding technology is not readily available. In most circumstances, the cost of technology is extremely expensive for farmers and processors. Sometimes, the technology offered is irrelevant to SME levels. In addition, efficient and cost-effective dissemination systems for technology are still lacking. As a result, if this issue is not addressed, the country will be unable to grab a significant market share in the global market. A major obstacle to increasing marketing efficiency is the lack of market research data and information. In the production of date value-added products, there is a lack of scientific skills and modern techniques.
Postharvest handling of dates currently in Oman is generally poor, and there is a lack of awareness about the efficiency of the value addition that may increase production (Al-Hinai et al. 2022b, Dhehibi et al. 2018). The country has not been able to capture significant premium markets due to limited value addition to its exports beyond primary processing. Given the growing importance of date value-added products in national, regional, and worldwide markets, increased value addition is extremely important.
Minimal date industry research on marketing is another potential weakness. Despite the date markets are accumulated with large production volume compared to the rest of the world, only a few studies have looked into major stakeholder elements. Threats are external problems that may cause long-term issues for the sector’s strategy plan. They are often presented as strategic issues that the date industry must handle in order to succeed in the future. Climate change poses a longer-term threat, as agricultural systems adjust to changing conditions in order to retain high-quality output. International markets are becoming increasingly demanding of such standards and norms, both for industrial sectors and for consumers. If the date fruit is not properly handled from harvest to final processing, the date value-added industry will not move forward and grow. To meet the minimum marketing standards, low-grade fruit cannot be processed into an added-value or commercial product. In addition, there is a threat for the local value-addition industry due to imported date products from the regional countries. By quality standards, local value-added products are facing unwinnable market competition even in local market space.
In order to improve agricultural product output, value addition is crucial. Improving the value-added process of date products in Oman is critical for increasing production, reducing postharvest losses, and boosting agricultural income and the country’s economy. Further, the ability to increase value-added product exports and compete with other global products will be enhanced. On the other hand, global product imports could be reduced in order to boost local production. The value addition procedure can extend the shelf life of products by providing an opportunity to sell them during the off-season.
The level of mechanization in various farm categories is linked to the advancement of the value-addition process. According to the three farm categories (individual, group, and SMEs) selected in this study, the mechanization level of each category can be improved to increase the production per unit area, to increase the efficiency of the value-added products, and to introduce new value-added products in the markets. It also contributed to raising the level of relations between Oman and various countries of the world and increasing the enthusiasm of farmers for the adoption of new machinery. Consumers of local products will have more confidence if more efficient technologies are used.
The value addition process also contributed in improving the productivity as shown by the results of this study. The productivity can be improved by increasing the production of the value-added products, enhancing the agricultural machinery and technology used, and improving the labor skills. By increasing the productivity resources, the net income will increase and the production cost will decrease, thus will increase the profitability of the farm in the medium- and long-terms.
There are few important areas to improve so that local date value-added products can compete with the products in the international markets or imported products. Three such important areas are the technology transfer, availability of technological services, and capacity building for the stakeholders involved in the value-addition sector. Government ministries have made some initiatives in line with the Oman Visions 2040 development program.
Food loss and waste reduction efforts have recently gained a lot of attention for their roles in improving food security and environmental sustainability. Adding value to agricultural products could result in a higher production rate, less food losses, and hence more farm income and a better economy. This study evaluated the status of the value addition process of the date products in Oman and revealed the challenges associated with the productivity improvement. Six date factories were visited to collect the data of the most industrial date value-added products, date with nuts, syrup, and paste, and the two most popular date varieties used for value addition processes are Khalas and Fardh. The Sultanate of Oman’s diversity in farm holdings and mechanization levels led to the identification of three agricultural systems for this study: individual, group, and SMEs, which cover more than 99% of farm landholdings with various mechanization levels.
The value addition process is contributed to the productivity improvement. The date with nuts got the highest productivity ratio compared to the other two selected value-added products that may reach up to 540% in Khalas and 360% in Fardh. Because of the highest productivity ratio, the date with nuts value-added products of the two date varieties Khalas and Fardh achieved the largest productivity improvement compared to the other value-added products based on the base values of the raw date productivities. It is found that the productivity increased with the increase in the mechanization levels.
In order to compete with foreign products in global markets, future improvements in the value addition process of date palm in Oman required are (1) increasing the quality and quantity of production, (2) controlling postharvest losses, (3) improving the mechanization level at different farm categories, and (4) raising the efficiency of local products. The entire process of value addition of agricultural products will enhance the economy by increasing agriculture’s GDP contribution, food exports, farmers’ income, sustainability, and farmers’ dignity. Further, the technology transfer and capacity building needs for the stakeholders of the date value-addition industry should be given the deserved attention which can enhance the quality of local products, increase employment opportunities, and improve the farm income, which will positively affect the country’s economy. These studies will contribute to achieving food security by adding value to date products in the Sultanate of Oman and other Gulf Cooperation Council countries.
This project would not be possible without the support of the Sultan Qaboos University, which provided the full scholarship, research funds and facilities for the first author.
ACoO. 2014. Agricultural Census of Oman 2014.
Abdallah, OI., Alamer, SS., Alrasheed, AM., Almundarij, A.A., 2019. Residue distribution, safety evaluation, processing factor and dissipation kinetics of bifenthrin and ethion in date fruits. Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods 11(6): 577–588. 10.3920/QAS2019.1597
Al-Dairi, M., Pathare, PB., Al-Yahyai, R., 2021. Chemical and nutritional quality changes of tomato during postharvest transportation and storage. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences 20(6): 401–408. 10.1016/j.jssas.2021.05.001
Al-Hinai, A., Jayasuriya, H., Pathare, PB., Al-Shukaili, T., Al-Abri, I., 2022a. Benefits of Value Addition in Agricultural Produce on Land, Water and Labor Productivities under Arid Agriculture: Case of Dates in Oman. Journal of Agricultural and Marine Sciences 27(2): 1–9. 10.53541/jams.vol27iss2pp1-9
Al-Hinai, A., Jayasuriya, H., Pathare, PB., Al-Shukaili, T., 2022b. Present status and prospects of value addition industry for agricultural produce–A review. Open Agriculture 7(1): 207–216. 10.1515/opag-2022-0084
Al Hinai, Al., Jayasuriya, H., 2021. Enhancing economic productivity of irrigation water by product value addition: Case of Dates. Journal of Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences 20 (8): 553–558. 10.1016/j.jssas.2021.06.007
Al-Lawati, B., Al-Khamiasi, K., Al-Siyabi, A., & Al-Zadjali, Z., 2016. A Diagnostic Study of Agricultural Marketing Routes and Methods in the Sultanate of Oman. https://www.maf.gov.om/BakEnd/Publications/636517460862941559.pdf
Al-Mulla, Y., Al-Gheilani, H.M., 2017. Increasing water productivity enhances water saving for date palm cultivation in Oman. Journal of Agricultural and Marine Science 22(1): 87–91. 10.24200/jams.vol22iss1pp87-91
Al-Yahyai, R., 2006. Improvement of date palm production in the Sultanate of Oman. III International Date Palm Conference 736: 337–343. 10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.736.32
Al-Yahyai, R., Khan, MM., 2015. Date palm status and perspective in Oman. In Date palm genetic resources and utilization (pp. 207–240). Springer. 10.1007/978-94-017-9707-8_6
Al Wahaibi, H., 2018. Water productivity in Omani agriculture and the role of research and technology in improving the productivity. International Workshop on “Using WaPOR Tool to Assess Water Productivity in Agriculture of Oman, 1-2 October, 2018, Middle East Disalination Research Center (MEDRC) Oman.
Cai, X., Molden, D., Mainuddin, M., Sharma, B., Ahmad, M.-D., Karimi, P., 2011. Producing more food with less water in a changing world: assessment of water productivity in 10 major river basins. Water International, 36(1): 42–62. 10.1080/02508060.2011.542403
Clarke, L.J., 2000. Strategies for Agricultural Mechanization Development: The roles of the private sectore and the Government.
Dhehibi, B., Salah, MB., Frija, A., 2018. Date palm value chain analysis and marketing opportunities for the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. In Agricultural Economics-Current Issues. IntechOpen. 10.5772/intechopen.82450
Evans, E., 2012. Value added agriculture: is it right for me. Obtenido de EDIS Document FE638, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville: http://Edis.Ifas.Ufl.Edu/Pdffiles/FE/FE63800.Pdf (Acceso: 31/05/2013).
Fadavi, R., Keyhani, A., Mohtasebi, S.S., 2010. Estimation of a mechanization index in apple orchard in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science (Toronto) 2(4): 180–185. 10.5539/jas.v2n4p180
FAO. 2013. Food wastage footprint: Impacts on natural resources. FAO.
FAO, I., 2020. Food Loss and Waste Must Be Reduced for Greater Food Security and Environmental Sustainability.
FAOSTAT. 2019. FAO Statistics online. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC
Hossen, MA., 2019. Mechanization in Bangladesh: Way of modernization in agriculture. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology 67(9): 69–77. 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V67I9P212
Ishag, KHM., 2017. Dates Palm Farming Systems Sustainability and Risk Efficiency in Oman. Sustainable Agriculture Research 6(526-2017–2657). 10.5539/sar.v6n1p39
Jayasuriya, HPW., Al-Ismaili, AM., Al-Shukaili, T., 2017. Farming Systems in Oman and Mechanization Potentials. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa, and Latin America 48(2): 66.
Joseph, S., 2017. The Sultanate of Oman’s agricultural and domestic sector: Using water footprint and virtual water tools to quantify and assess impacts of water use. A Report Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the MSc. Imperial College London, Faculty of Natural Sciences, 150.
Kiaya, V., 2014. Post-harvest losses and strategies to reduce them. Technical Paper on Postharvest Losses, Action Contre La Faim (ACF), 25.
Kotagama, HB., Al-Alawi, AJT., Boughanmi, H., Zekri, S., Mbaga, M., Jayasuriya, H., 2014. Economic analysis determining the optimal replanting age of date palm. Journal of Agricultural and Marine Sciences [JAMS] 19: 51–61. 10.24200/jams.vol19iss0pp51-61
Lewbel, A., 2003. Calculating compensation in cases of wrongful death. Journal of Econometrics, 113(1): 115–128. 10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00169-0
MAF. 2010. Agricultural Statistics Year Book 2010. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries.
MAF. 2011a. Agriculture and livestock five-year research strategy 2011–2015.
MAF. 2011b. Assessing Returns to Support Investments in the two Agricultural Development Projects (ICARDA & MAF (eds.); June 2011). International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas.
MAF. 2017. About Agricultural Sector. http://www.maf.gov.om/Pages/About.aspx?id=100&lang=AR&I=104199&DId=0&CId=0&CMSId=800245
MAF. 2019a. Date production book 2019. Ministry of Agricultural and Fisharies.
MAF. 2019b. The Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics 2019. Ministry of Agricultural and Fisharies.
NCSI. 2020. Statistical Year Book 2020. National Centre for Statistics and Information. https://www.arabdevelopmentportal.com/sites/default/files/publication/bar_statistical_year_book_2020-14_4f5cf07c-02d9-4e13-b7aa-0d6b21912f67.pdf
Ravi, S.B., Swaminathan, M.S., 2012. Enhancing food and income security of rural families through production, processing and value addition of regional staple food grains. Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods 4(3): 157–157. 10.1111/j.1757-837X.2012.00171.x
Shafiee-Jood, M., Cai, X., 2016. Reducing food loss and waste to enhance food security and environmental sustainability. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(16): 8432–8443. 10.1021/acs.est.6b01993