What is the best way to ensure that valid analytical methods are used for food control?
Main Article Content
Keywords
analytical criteria, fitness for purpose, food control, standard methods, uncertainty
Abstract
Monitoring and Quality Assurance in the Food Supply Chain is a Network of Excellence funded by the European Union. This Network of Excellence aims to make food safer by harmonizing the quality of methods used for food control. Part of this process involves the development and validation of new methods, including rapid methods and emerging technologies; the production of practical harmonized guidance on method validation and criteria for analytical methods; and the production of reference and testing materials to be used for food control. New technologies and analytical research enable us to measure new and emerging food contaminants and other chemicals that may be a threat to the health of the consumer. Once risk assessment confirms the threat, legislation may be enacted to limit the amount of these chemicals present in food that is sold. In order to enforce this legislation it is necessary to be able to detect the presence of chemical and measure its concentration in food. Hence, the consumer protection provided by enforcement depends on how well the measurement method performs. We need to be confident that measurement methods are performing sufficiently well to protect the consumer, without leading to the rejection of large quantities of food that comply with legislation. A number of approaches that can be used to provide confidence include: the use of standard methods, the use of analytical criteria that describe the performance of a method, and consideration of fitness for purpose based on measurement uncertainty. This paper examines the utility and ease of application of the different approaches. In addition a simp
References
CEN. (N.d.) CENELC Position Paper. Available at http://www.din.de/sixcms_upload/media/2896/CEN%20CENELEC
Currie L.A., Svehla G. (1994) Nomenclature for the presentation of results of chemical analysis. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 66,595–608.
Ettre L.S. 1993 Nomenclature for chromatography. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 65, 819–872.
European Union (EU). (1998) Directive 98/53/EC, Laying down the sampling methods and the methods of analysis for the official control of the levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union, L201, 93–101
European Union (EU). (2002) Commission Decision 2002/657/EC, implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. Official Journal of the European Union, L221, 8–36.
European Union (EU). (2004) Report on the relationship between analytical results, measurement uncertainty, recovery factors and the provisions of EU food and feed legislation, with particular reference to community legislation concerning contaminants in food and undesirable substances in feed, Annex 2 Available at http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/chemicalsafety/contaminants/report-sampling_analysis_2004_en.pdf
European Union (EU). (2006a) Commission Regulation 1883/2006, laying down methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of levels of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs in certain foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union, L364, 32–43.
European Union (EU). (2006b) Commission Regulation 401/2006, laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of the levels of mycotoxins in foodstuffs.Official Journal of the European Union, L70, 12–34.
European Union (EU). (2006c) Commission Regulation 1881/2006, setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union, L364,558–577.
European Union (EU). (2006d) Commission Regulation 401/2006, laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of the levels of mycotoxins in foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union, L70, 12–34.
European Union (EU). (2007) Commission Regulation 333/2007, laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of the levels of lead, cadmium, mercury, inorganic tin, 3-MCPD and benzo(a)pyrene in foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union, L88, 29–38.
European Union (EU). (2008) European Commission, SANCO/2004/2726-rev 4 December. Guidelines for the implementation of decision 2002/657/EC. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/chemicalsafety/residues/cons_2004-2726rev4_en.pdf
Eurachem. (2000) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement. 2nd edition. Available at http://www.measurementuncertainty.org/
Horwitz W. (1995) Protocol for the design, conduct and interpretation of method performance studies. Pure and Applied Chemistry,67, 331–343.
Horwitz W., Kamps L.R., Boyer K.W., Boyer (1980) Quality assurance in the analysis of foods and trace constituents. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 63,1344–1354.
ISO/IEC Guide 98. (1995) Uncertainty of measurement–Part 3:Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995). Availability at http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=50461.
ISO 5725-2. (1994) Official Journal of the European Union L88.Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results–Part 2: Basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method. Available at http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=11834.
Lovelock J.E. (1958) A sensitive detector for gas chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A,1, 35–46.
Macarthur R., Feinberg M., Bertheau Y. (2010) Construction of measurement uncertainty profiles for quantitative analysis of genetically modified organisms based on interlaboratory validation data. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 93, 1046–1056.
Rocke D.M., Lorenzato S. (1995) A two-component model for measurement error in analytical chemistry. Technometrics, 37,176–184.
The European Network of Genetically Modified OrganismLaboratories. (2008) Definition of minimum performance requirements for analytical methods of GMO testing. Available at http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/doc/Min_Perf_Requir_Analyt_methods_131008.pdf
Thompson M. (2000) Recent trends in inter-laboratory precision at ppb and sub-ppb concentrations in relation to fitness for purpose criteria in proficiency testing. Analyst,125, 385–386.
Thompson M., Ellison S.L.R., Fajgelj A., Willetts P., Wood R.(1999) Harmonized guidelines for the use of recovery information in analytical measurement. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 71, 337–348.
Thompson M., Ellison SLR., Wood R. (2002) Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 74, 835–855.