Testing a toolbox for impact assessment of food safety regulations: maximum levels for T-2 and HT-2 toxins in the European Union
Main Article Content
Keywords
cereals, food safety regulations, HT-2 toxin, multi-criteria analysis, regulatory impact assessmentT-2 toxin
Abstract
Introduction The aim of socio-economic research in the MoniQA Network of Excellence is to develop a toolbox to support impact assessment of proposed food safety regulatory changes. Objectives The scope of this contribution is to present an initial version of such a toolbox with its application to a case study, which concerns a proposal on setting maximum levels of T-2 and HT-2 toxins in cereals and cereal products. A regulatory proposal of ‘strict’ maximum limits is compared with two alternative options: the ‘do nothing’ option and the ‘soft’ regulatory option. Methods The proposed toolbox involves a preliminary qualitative assessment of the likely impacts of each of the policy options considered, with a coding/
scoring procedure, in order to identify the greatest impacts. A feasibility filter subsequently considers the availability of data necessary for impact quantification. The subsequent quantitative assessment is performed with different methodologies for the most important impacts. Finally, a multi-criteria analysis approach –which allows for a combination of qualitative and quantitative measurements – is used to arrive at a ranking of policy options. Results The outcome of this assessment exercise is that the ‘do nothing’ option is clearly the most preferable option, and, between the two regulatory options (options 2 and 3), the setting out of ‘strict’ maximum limits is preferable to ‘soft’ maximum limits. Conclusion This
case study shows the potentialities of the toolbox as support to policy makers, which will be improved and tested with additional case studies in the remaining years of the MoniQA Network of Excellence
References
Aldred D., Magan N., Olsen M. (2004) The use of HACCP in the control of mycotoxins: the case of cereals. In Mycotoxins in Food: Detection and Control eds Magan N., Olsen M. pp.139–173. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge.
Alldrick A.J. (2003) Reducing the risk of mycotoxin contamination through the application of HACCP and other quality management techniques. Aspects of Applied Biology, 68,139–146.
Codex Alimentarius Commission. (1995) Codex general standard for contaminants and toxins in foods. CODEX STAN 193-1995.
Codex Alimentarius Commission. (2003) Code of practice for the prevention and reduction of mycotoxin contamination in cereals, including annexes on ochratoxin a, zearalenone, fumonisins and tricothecenes. CAC/RCP 51-2003.
Commission of the European Communities. (2006a)Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union, L 364,5–24.
Commission of the European Communities. (2006b) Commission Recommendation of 17 August 2006 on the prevention and reduction of Fusarium toxins in cereals and cereal products (2006/583/EC). Official Journal of the European Union,: L 234, : 35–40.
Commission of the European Communities. (2006c)Commission Regulation (EC) No 401/2006 of 23 February 2006 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of the levels of mycotoxins in foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union,: L70, 12–34.
D ?orner D., Wearing A. (1995) Complex problem solving: toward (computer simulated) theory. In Complex problem solving: The European Perspective eds Frensch P.A., Funke J. pp. 65–99. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Eriksen G.S., Alexander J. (eds). (1998) Fusarium toxins in cereals– a risk assessment. Copenhagen, Nordic Council of Ministers. Tema Nord, 502, 7–44.
European Commission Directorate General Regional Policy. (2008) Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. Structural Funds, Cohesion Fund and Instrument for Pre-Accession. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/guides/cost/guide2008_en.pdf
European Commission (EC). (2009a) Impact Assessment Guidelines. Rep. SEC (2009) 92, 15 January 2009.
European Commission (EC). (2009b) Part III. Annexes to Impact Assessment Guidelines, 15 January 2009.
Gareis M., Zimmermann C., Schothorst R., Paulsch W., VidnesA., Bergsten C., Paulsen B., Brera C., Miraglia M., Grossi S., Debegnach F. (2003) Collection of occurrence data of Fusarium toxins in food and assessment of dietary intake by the population of EU Member States. Reports on Tasks for Scientific Cooperation, Task 3.2.10, Directorate-General Health and Consumer Protection.
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). (1993).Some Naturally Occurring Substances: Food Items and Constituents, Heterocyclic Aromatic Amines and Mycotoxins. Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans,Vol.56. World Health Organization, Lyon.
Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). (2001) T-2 and HT-2 toxins. In Safety Evaluation of Certain Mycotoxins in Fooded. WHOpp. 557–680, WHO, Geneve, Switzerland.
Krnv L., Thissen W.A.H. (2000) Rationality in decision-and policy-making: implications for strategic environmental assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal,18,191–200.
Magan N., Olsen M. (2004). Mycotoxins in Food: Detection and Control. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge.
Magan N. (2006) Mycotoxin contamination of food in Europe: early detection and prevention strategies. Mycopathologia,162,245–253.
Magan N., Aldred D. (2007) Post-harvest control strategies: minimizing mycotoxins in the food chain. International Journal of Food Microbiology,119, 131–139.
Mazzocchi M., Ragona M., Giorgi L., Schiefer G., Fritz M.,Novelli E., Krapp H., Spichtinger D., Poms R. (2009) Assessing the socio-economic dimension of food quality and safety regulations: research challenges and recent advances. Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops and Foods,1,195–200.
Munda G. (1995). Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment: Theory and Applications in Ecological Economics. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.
Ragona M., Mazzocchi M. (2008) Food safety regulation, economic impact assessment and quantitative methods. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 21,145–158.
Schothorst R.C., van Egmond H.P. (2004) ‘‘Report from SCOOPtask 3.2.10 ‘‘collection of occurrence data of Fusarium toxins in food and assessment of dietary intake by the population of EU member states’’: subtask: trichothecenes. Toxicology Letters,153, 133–143.
Scientific Committee on Food (SCF). (2001) Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Food on Fusarium toxins. Part 5: T-2 and HT-2 toxins, adopted on 30 May 2001. SCF/CS/CNTM/MYC/25 Rev 6 Final. European Commission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/scf/out88_en.pdf
Solfrizzo M., Alldrick A.J., van Egmond H.P. (2009) The use of mycotoxin methodology in practice: a need for harmonization. Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops and Foods,1, 121–132.
Sternberg R.J, Frensch P.A. (1991). Complex Problem Solving: Principles and Mechanisms. Lawrence Erlbaum, London.