Single laboratory method performance evaluation for the analysis of Roundup Ready® soy flour by qualitative and quantitative detection methods
Main Article Content
Keywords
DNA, 35S promoter, Tnos, CP4 EPSPS, real-time PCR, verification
Abstract
The Republic of Turkey has approved 7 soybean and 25 corn genetically modified (GM) events for animal feed use only and the biosafety legislation has banned the cultivation of GM crops and requires that all genetically modified organisms (GMOs), including imports, to be approved for use and further establishes a strict policy of testing for food, feed and seed potentially containing GMOs. For the GMO analysis, each laboratory should establish the verification on method performance criteria and calculation of measurement uncertainty. The aim of this study is to define the verification of qualitative and quantitative detection of Roundup Ready® soybean as a model for single laboratory verification in the context of the European Network of GMOs Laboratories guidance documents. First, two methods were used for the extraction of nucleic acids (DNA) and their extraction efficiencies were compared based on the quantity, purity, fragmentation state of DNA and inhibition in polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Second, a verification procedure of a real time PCR method for qualitative detection of cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter and Agrobacterium tumefaciens Tnos sequences in DNA samples extracted from certified reference materials and GM soy flour samples was performed. Last, the standard curves were prepared in order to explain verification of quantitative real-time PCR analysis by reaching the ideal value of -3.62 for lec reference gene and -3.40 for A. tumefaciens strain CP4 5-enolpyruvulshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) enzyme target gene. All method performance criteria for quantification (within-laboratory reproducibility standard deviation, relative standard deviation, uncertainty, bias, limit of detection, limit of quantification, and linearity) were met and thus the method in this study was verified. Finally, the document highlights a clear example for analysis of GMOs in food and feed samples, and points out the need for interlaboratory studies at the national and international level.
References
European Network of GMO Laboratories (ENGL), 2008. Definition of minimum performance requirements for analytical methods of GMO testing. European Network of GMO Laboratories, Ispra, Italy.
European Commission (EC), 2008. Report on the validation of a DNA extraction method for soybean seeds. European Union Reference Laboratory for GM Food and Feed (EU-RL GMFF), Ispra, Italy.
European Commission (EC), 2014. Report on the validation of a DNA extraction method for soybean seeds. European Union, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, Ispra, Italy.
Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN), 2016. Agricultural biotechnology update. USDA foreign agricultural report global agricultural information network, report number: TR6026. USDA, Washington, DC, USA.
International Standard Organization (ISO), 2005a. ISO 21098 Foodstuffs-nucleic acid-based methods of analysis of genetically modified organisms and derived products-information to be supplied and procedure for the addition of methods to ISO 21569, ISO 21570 or ISO 21571. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.
International Standard Organization (ISO), 2005b. ISO 21571:2005 Foodstuffs-methods of analysis for the detection of genetically modified organisms and derived products-nucleic acid extraction. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.
International Standard Organization (ISO), 2006. ISO 24276:2006 Foodstuffs-methods of analysis for the detection of genetically modified organisms and derived products-general requirements. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kamle, S. and Ali, S., 2013. Genetically modified crops: detection strategies and biosafety issues. Gene 522: 123-132.
Lim, H., Hwang, H.J., Kim, A.R., Cho, M.H., Ji, H., Kim, C.K., Ji, S.U., Cho, J.I., Park, S.C. and Lee, G.S., 2016. A simple, rapid and systematic method for the developed GM rice analysis. Plant Biotechnology Reports 10: 25-33.
Masip, G., Sabalza, M., Pérez-Massot, E., Banakar, R., Cebrian, D., Twyman, R.M., Capell, T., Albajes, R. and Christou, P., 2013. Paradoxical EU agricultural policies on genetically engineered crops. Trends in Plant Science 18: 312-324.
Mazzara, M., Munaro, B., Larcher, S., Grazioli, E., Delobel, C., Savini, C., Van den Eede, G., 2007. Event-specific method for the quantification of soybean line 40-3-2 using real-time PCR – validation report and protocol – report on the validation of a DNA extraction method for soybean seeds. EUR 23086 EN, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Monsanto, 2000. Updated molecular characterization and safety assessment of Roundup Ready soybean event 40-3-2. Monsanto Product Safety Center, St. Louise, MO, USA.
Pfaffl, M.W., Horgan, G.W. and Dempfle, L., 2002. Relative expression software tool (REST©) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 30: e36.
Querci, M., Jermini, M. and Van den Eede, G., 2006. The analysis of food samples for the presence of genetically modified organisms. European Union Reference Laboratory for GM Food and Feed (EU-RL GMFF), Ispra, Italy.
Trapman, S., Burns, M., Broll, H., Macarthur, R., Wood, R. and Zel, J., 2009. Guidance document on measurement uncertainty for GMO testing laboratories. Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Waiblinger, H.U. and Grohmann, L., 2014. Guidelines for validation of DNA extraction methods applied in subsequent PCR analysis of food and feed products for the presence of genetically modified material. Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit 9: 183-190.