Effect of the irrigation frequency and quality on yield, growth and water productivity of maize crops

Main Article Content

M.T. Amin
L. Anjum
A.A. Alazba
M. Rizwan


HEIS, irrigation frequency, irrigation quality, maize, raised bed irrigation system


A research study was conducted to examine the crop responses of maize under two irrigation systems, i.e. raised bed and high-efficiency irrigation system (HEIS; drip irrigation) systems, with three irrigation frequencies and three levels of irrigation water quality. The trial was carried out in a completely randomised design mode with triple replication of each treatment. The raised bed irrigation system demonstrated better performance in terms of crop parameters: plant height, biological yield and grain yield for the raised bed system were recorded as 1, 5 and 21%, respectively, higher than the drip irrigation system. Field measurements for the HEIS showed that the biological yield, grain yield and harvest index were quadratically correlated with the frequency of irrigation. Better results were obtained for plots irrigated every 2 or 6 days than for those irrigated every 4 days. Good-quality water raised plant biological yield by 12% and grain yield by 14.85%. The irrigation frequency had a clear-cut effect on total dry matter weight and grain yield was dependent on the quality of the irrigated water. The raised bed with furrow irrigation system produced the highest harvest index for all of the levels of water quality and the highest water use efficiencies were observed for good-quality water. The vigorous crop growth in those plots irrigated using the raised bed irrigation system resulted from salts leaching away from the crop’s root zone; however, because it uses more irrigation water for crop production than the HEIS, this system is not preferred.

Abstract 48 | PDF Downloads 31


Agassi, M. and Ben-Hur, M., 1992. Stabilizing steep slopes with soil conditioners and plants. Soil Technology 5: 249-256.
Ahmad, M. and Farooq, U., 2010. The state of food security in Pakistan: future challenges and coping strategies. In: Proceedings of the 26thAGM and Conference of PSDE, 28-30 December 2010, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Al-Tahir, O. A., Al-Nabulsi, Y.A. and Helalia, A.M., 1997. Effects of water quality and frequency of irrigation on growth and yield of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Agricultural Water Management 34: 17-24.
American Society of Association Executives (ASAE), 1998. Cubes, pellets, and crumbles — definitions and methods for determining density, durability, and moisture content. ASAE standards, S269.4 DEC96. ASAE, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 525-527.
Balaswamy, K., Reddy, B.B., Reddy, K.A., Reddy, B.B. and Reddy, M.V., 1986. Effect of planting patterns mulches and soil moisture regimes on growth and yield attributes of maize. The Madras Agricultural Journal 73: 553-557.
Bernstein, L. and Francois, L.E., 1973a. Comparisons of drip, furrow, and sprinkle irrigation. Soil Science 115: 73-86.
Bernstein, L. and Francois, L.E., 1973b. Leaching requirement studies: sensitivity of alfalfa to salinity of irrigation and drainage waters. Soil Science Society of American Journal 37: 931-943.
Bresler, E., McNael, B.L. and Carter, D.L., 1982. Saline and sodic soils: principles, dynamics-modeling. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 236.
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) World Factbook, 1995. The library of congress country studies. CIA, Washington, DC, USA. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook.
Cetin, O., 1996. Water consumption of second crop maize in the Harran Plain. General publication no. 90. Research Institute of Sanliurfa, Sanliurfa, Turkey, pp. 46.
El-Hendawy, S.E. and Schmidhalter, U., 2010. Optimal coupling combinations between irrigation frequency and rate for drip-irrigated maize grown on sandy soil. Agricultural Water Management 97: 439-448.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2002. Deficit irrigation practices. Water report no. 22. FAO, Rome, Italy.
Gideon, O., DeMalach, Y., Gillerman, L., David, I. and Lurie, S., 2002. Effect of water salinity and irrigation technology on yield and quality of pears. Biosystems Engineering 81: 237-247.
Government of Pakistan (GOP), 2008a. Pakistan social and living standards measurement survey 2006-07. Federal Bureau of Statistics, Islamabad, Pakistan. Available at: http://www.pbs.gov.pk/content/pakistan-social-and-living-standards-measurement.
Government of Pakistan (GOP), 2008b. Assorted data and information. Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Ministry of the Environment, Islamabad, Pakistan. Available at: http://environment.gov.pk/.
Hanson, B., Douglas, P. and Orloff, S., 2000. Effectiveness of tensiometers and electrical resistance sensors varies with soil conditions. California Agriculture 54: 47-50.
Hess, A., 1996. A microcomputer scheduling program for supplementary irrigation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 15: 233-243.
Howell, T.A., Yazar, A., Schneider, A.D., Dusek, D.A. and Copeland, K.S., 1995. Yield and water use efficiency of maize in response to LEPA irrigation. Transactions of the ASAE 38: 1737-1747.
Hussaini, M.A., Ogunlela, V.B., Ramalan, A.A. and Falaki, A.M., 2001. Growth and development of maize (Zea mays L.) in response to different levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and irrigation. Crop Research 22: 141-149.
Hussaini, M.A., Ogunlela, V.B., Ramalan, A.A., Falaki, A.M. and Lalwal, A.B., 2002. Productivity and water use in maize (Zea mays L.) as influenced nitrogen, phosphorus and irrigation levels. Crop Research 23: 228-234.
Inamullah, N.H., Shah, N.R., Siddiq, M. and Khan, Z., 2011. Phenology yields and their correlations in popular local and exotic maize hybrids at various nitrogen levels. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 27: 363-369.
Istanbulluoglu, A., Kocaman, I. and Konukcu, F., 2002. Water use-production relationship of maize under Tekirdag conditions in Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 5: 287-291.
Jabran, K., Zahid, A. and Farooq, M., 2011. Maize: cereal with a variety of uses. Available at: http://www.agrihunt.pk/major-crops/168-maizecereal-with-a-variety-of-uses.html.
Jabro, J.D., Evans, R.G., Kim, Y. and Iversen, W.M., 2009. Estimating in situ soil–water retention and field water capacity in two contrasting soil textures. Irrigation Science 27: 223-229.
Jiotode, D.J., Lambe, D.L. and Dhawad, C.S., 2002. Growth parameters and water use studies of maize on influenced by irrigation levels and row spacing. Crop Research 24: 292-295.
Kamal, S., 2009. Pakistan’s water challenges: entitlement, access, efficiency and equity. In: Kugelman, M. and Hathaway, R.M. (eds.) Running on empty: Pakistan’s water crises. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC, USA.
Kara, T. and Biber, C., 2008. Irrigation frequencies and maize (Zea mays L.) yield relation in Northern Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 11: 123-126.
Karlberg, L., Rockström, J., Annandale, J.G. and Styne, J.M., 2007. Low-cost drip irrigation – a suitable technology for southern Africa: an example with tomatoes using saline irrigation water. Agricultural Water Management 89: 59-70.
Katerji, N., Van Hoorn, J.W., Hamdy, A. and Mastrorilli, M., 2003. Salinity effect on crop development and yield, analysis of salt tolerance according to several classification methods. Agricultural Water Management 62: 37-66.
Katerji, N., Van Hoorn, J.W., Hamdy, A. and Mastrorilli, M., 2004. Comparison of maize yield response to plant water stress caused by salinity and by drought. Agricultural Water Management 65: 95-101.
Khaliq, T., Mahmood, T. and Masood, A., 2004. Effectiveness of farmyard manure, poultry manure and nitrogen for corn (Zea mays L.) productivity. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2: 260-263.
Kirkham, M.B., 2005. Principles of soil and plant water relations. Elsevier, Burlington, VT, USA.
Meek, B.D., Rechel, E.A., Carter, L.M. and DeTar, W.R., 1988. Soil compaction and its effect on alfalfa in zone production systems. Soil Science Society of American Journal 52: 233-236.
Meek, B.D., Rechel, E.A., Carter, L.M., DeTar, W.R. and Urie, A.L., 1992. Infiltration rate of a sandy loam soil: effects of traffic, tillage, and plant roots. Soil Science Society of American Journal 56: 908-913.
Moodie, C.D., Smith, H.W. and McCreery, R.A., 1959. Laboratory manual for soil fertility. Washington State College, Pullman, WA, USA, pp. 31-39.
Munns, R., 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell and Environment 25: 239-250.
Myers, R., Foale, M. and Done, A., 1984. Responses of grain sorghum to varying irrigation frequency in the Ord irrigation area. II. Evapotranspiration, water use efficiency and root distribution of different cultivars. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35: 31-42.
Oster, J.D., 1994. Irrigation with poor quality water-review article. Agricultural Water Management 25: 271-297.
Patel, M.S. and Singh, N.T., 1981. Changes in bulk density and water intake rate of a coarse textured soil in relation to different levels of compaction. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 29: 110-112.
Paudyal, K.R., Ransom, J.K., Rajbhandari, N.P., Adhakari, K., Gerpacio, R.V. and Pingali, P.L., 2001. Maize in Nepal: production systems, constraints and priorities for research. NARC and CIMMYT, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Payero, J.O., Melvin, S.R., Irmak, S. and Tarkalson, D., 2006. Yield response of maize to deficit irrigation in a semiarid climate. Agricultural Water Management 84: 101-112.
Phene, C.J. and Beale, O.W., 1976. High-frequency irrigation for water nutrient management in humid regions. Soil Science Society of American Journal 40: 430-436.
Rawls, W.J., Brakensiek, D.L. and Saxton, K.E., 1982. Estimation of soil water properties. Transactions of the ASAE 25: 1316-1320.
Reddy, S.R., 2006. Agronomy of field crops (2nd Ed.). Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi India, 209 pp.
Riaz, M., Jamil, M. and Mahmood, T.Z., 2007. Yield and yield components of maize as affected by various weed control methods under rain-fed conditions of Pakistan. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 9: 152-155.
Sachan, S.S. and Gangawar, U.S., 1996. Effect of row spacing, moisture conservation practices and levels of nitrogen on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation 24: 125-127.
Sarwar, A. and Bastiaanssen, W.G.M., 2001. Long-term effects of irrigation water conservation on crop production and environment in semi-arid zones. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 127: 331-338.
Seckler, D.W., Amarasinghe, U., Molden, D.J., De Silva, R. and Barker, R., 1998a. World water and supply, 1990-2025: scenarios and issues. Research report 19. International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Seckler, D.W., Molden, D.J. and Barker, R., 1998b. Water scarcity in the twenty-first century. Research report. International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Shalhevet, J., 1994. Using water of marginal quality for crop production: major issues. Agricultural Water Management 25: 233-269.
Shani, U. and Dudley, L.M., 2001. Field studies of crop response to water and salt stress. Soil Science Society of American Journal 65: 1522-1528.
Singh, K.K., Colvin, T.S., Erbach, D.C. and Mughal, A.Q., 1992. Tilth index: an approach to quantifying soil tilth. Transactions of the ASAE 35: 1777-1785.
World Bank, 2011. Land and water development division (FAO). FAO, Rome, Italy. Available at: http://www.fao.org/nr/aboutnr/nrl/en/.